Feeds:
Posts
Comments

 

 

 

A Timeline

2012

 
Trayvon Martin ambushes a ‘Community Watch’ patrolman named George Zimmerman. Martin is on the phone with his girlfriend, Rachel Jeantel, & tells her that some “Creepy Ass Cracker” is following me. Martin jumps him & is slamming Zimmerman’s head into a concrete sidewalk all the while trying to get control of Zimmerman’s sidearm. Zimmerman defends his life & shoots Martin in self defense. Black community goes NUTS & our traitorous media(TM) has a field day with the story. Zimmerman was eventually cleared of all wrongdoings.

2013

 
Zimmerman was aquitted at his trial. The ‘BlackLivesMatter’ bowel MOVEMENT is started.

2014

July – Eric Garner is confronted by NY Police. A fight on the street broke out & Garner allegedly had helped to break it up. PD arrives on scene & asks Garner to leave. Garner refuses to obey the Police requests to leave. Garner then gets belligerent with the police and police attempt to place him under arrest.

“Garner had been arrested by the NYPD thirty times since 1980 on charges such as assault, resisting arrest, and grand larceny.”  ~ Via Wiki

Garner dies from resisting arrest and being subdued. Our “TM” runs the false narrative, “I Can’t Breathe”

August – Michael Brown commits a strong-arm burglary of a convenience store. Shortly there after, officer Darren Wilson sees him walking in the middle of the street & tells Brown to move to the sidewalk. Brown attacks Wilson. Wilson winds up killing him in self defense. Again, the black community goes nuts and untruths are spread by the ‘TM’ such as “Hands Up Don’t Shoot”. The USDoJ stuck their nose into the fray but couldn’t find any FACTS to support the black community’s claims. Wilson is NOT INDICTED by the Grand Jury.

2015

July – Sandra Bland is found dead in her cell while under arrest.

“A motion-activated camera outside her cell recorded no movement in the hallway for 90 minutes before jailers found her dead. An autopsy conducted by the Harris County medical examiner ruled Bland’s death a suicide and said it found no evidence of a violent struggle.” ~ via Wiki

 

BLM again goes on a rampage & the ‘TM’ fuels the fire.

2016

Alton Sterling & Philando Castile are now in the headlines. BLM’ers & the NBPP (New Black Panther Party) are causing headaches all across the land. Our ‘TM’ is once again fueling the outrage. Both of these individuals were carrying guns when stopped by the police. Sterling fought with officers before being shot. Castile, well, there is so much info on him, it’s hard to sort the facts from fiction.

I have just cited 6 individuals that were shot, or died, while dealing with our Law Enforcement officers. In 2016 — Over 1,600 people have been shot in Chicago alone. Over 200 of these have been killed. Most of these 1,600 have been ‘Black on Black’ violence.

Do you honestly think that we have an issue with LEO’s and their interaction with the black community? I do not. If you DO believe we have an EPIDEMIC of Police targeting blacks, then refer to the image below… Here’s Your Sign!

ImStupid

 

 

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Sixteenth Day of July in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen.


 

 

2AExplainedParchment

 

 

 

“Doing the same thing and expecting different results is insanity.”

 

This quote is attributed to Albert Einstein. Some folks say it was Benjamin Franklin, but that is not what is important. What IS important, is that it is the TRUTH!

 

 

In 1934, because of the GANG violence (when I say ‘GANGS’, I’m talking about Al Capone, Bugs Moran, & other Organized Crime bosses) in the likes of Chicago & a few other big cities. The Fedcoats started their UNCONSTITUTIONAL attacks on our 2nd Amendment rights. They began inflicting their “Infringements” on our rights via taxing of certain weapons, & regulating others. It was known as the National Firearms Act.
 

Legislative history of the National Firearms Act 1934

Introduced in the House as H.R. 9741 by Robert L. Doughton (D–NC) on May 28, 1934

Committee consideration by House Ways and Means, Senate Finance

Passed the House on June 13, 1934 (Passed)

Passed the Senate on June 18, 1934 (Passed)

Signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on June 26, 1934

 

 

 

For 82 years now, we have been beating this same dead horse — Gun Control! It has NEVER worked. It NEVER will work. Evil is in the HEARTS of men… not their Trigger Fingers! And evil men do NOT follow laws or know right from wrong.

 

 

“Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?
The Shadow knows.”

 

 

Just look at Chicago on ANY given weekend — dozens shot & several killed. So far in 2016, over 1600 people have been shot. There have been 165 days so far this year (2016) so that comes out to 10.2 people shot everyday — In Chicago alone!

 

 

http://abc7chicago.com/news/7-killed-32-wounded-in-chicago-weekend-shootings-/1382745/

 

 

Chicago Stats –  Year to Date (2016)
Total Shot: 1676

Total Homicides: 284

(Source:  http://heyjackass.com/ )

 

Chicago has some of the TOUGHEST Gun Control Laws of any locale. ‘GC Laws’ simply do not work. It is time to look at something different.

 

..

Proposal: Let us reverse course… Turn this ship around 180 degrees so to speak.

 

 

How about we enact a TEMPORARY Repeal of ALL Gun Control Laws. ALL of them. Allow those who want to, carry Concealed, or in the open, THEIR CHOICE, anywhere they so choose? And I mean ANYWHERE! This includes Emergency rooms, Banks, Courthouses, City Halls, Legislative Buildings, Halls of Congress, the White House, into a restaurant or bar, Gay Clubs, Dance Clubs, Rodeos, NBA games, NFL games — EVERYWHERE!

 

 

Let’s just SEE how bad our society shoots up one another. Let’s try this plan for 4 years and then we can go look at the statistics.  Who wants to bet that the ONLY ones that will be killed or shot will be the BAD GUYS & GALS!

 

 

I’ll bet you that the old saying is TRUE…

 

 

“An Armed Society is a Polite Society!”

 

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Thirteenth Day of June in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen.

 


 

 

 

PropertyTax

 

The Durham County Tax Collector is harassing, and threatening  a Korea Era war vet over property taxes. Since this is an continuing battle, the veteran’s name has been changed to protect his privacy.

 

 

The 1st portion of this post will be focused on the NC Constitution & some of the NC Tax Statutes. I know it is boring stuff, but my readers need to have a little background to thoroughly understand the issue at hand.

 

 

Now, we’ve ALL been told for years & years that you have to pay your property taxes or the “TAX MAN” will foreclose on your  home. That’s a Lie. Here in North Carolina, property tax is levied by the counties, and if you happen to live within the city limits, you get taxed via a city rate too. THIS IS COMPLETELY ILLEGAL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

Follow me now…

From the NC Constitution

http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/legislation/constitution/ncconstitution.html

Article I – Declaration of Rights

Sec. 19.  Law of the land; equal protection of the laws.

“No person shall be taken, imprisoned, or disseized of his freehold, liberties, or privileges, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any manner deprived of his life, liberty, or property, but by the law of the land.  No person shall be denied the equal protection of the laws; nor shall any person be subjected to discrimination by the State because of race, color, religion, or national origin.”

Article V – Finance

Sec. 2.  State and local taxation.

(1)        Power of taxation.  The power of taxation shall be exercised in a just and equitable manner, for public purposes only, and shall never be surrendered, suspended, or contracted away.

(2)        Classification.  Only the General Assembly shall have the power to classify property for taxation, which power shall be exercised only on a State-wide basis and shall not be delegated.  No class of property shall be taxed except by uniform rule, and every classification shall be made by general law uniformly applicable in every county, city and town, and other unit of local government.

(4)        Special tax areas.  Subject to the limitations imposed by Section 4, the General Assembly may enact general laws authorizing the governing body of any county, city, or town to define territorial areas and to levy taxes within those areas, in addition to those levied throughout the county, city, or town, in order to finance, provide, or maintain services, facilities, and functions in addition to or to a greater extent than those financed, provided, or maintained for the entire county, city, or town.

(5)        Purposes of property tax.  The General Assembly shall not authorize any county, city or town, special district, or other unit of local government to levy taxes on property, except for purposes authorized by general law uniformly applicable throughout the State, unless the tax is approved by a majority of the qualified voters of the unit who vote thereon.

 

 

As mentioned in (4) above, “Special tax areas” — Section 4 defines what areas can be taxed and for what purpose. (you can read it in its entirety at the link HERE, if you so choose)

Here is a portion of section 4:

“Sec. 4.  Limitations upon the increase of local government debt.

(1)        Regulation of borrowing and debt.  The General Assembly shall enact general laws relating to the borrowing of money secured by a pledge of the faith and credit and the contracting of other debts by counties, cities and towns, special districts, and other units, authorities, and agencies of local government.

(2)        Authorized purposes; two-thirds limitation.  The General Assembly shall have no power to authorize any county, city or town, special district, or other unit of local government to contract debts secured by a pledge of its faith and credit unless approved by a majority of the qualified voters of the unit who vote thereon, …”

 

Do you see the dilemma yet? Art.V Sec. 2 (2) of the NC Constitution(NCSC) states that ONLY the STATE of NC shall have the power to classify property for Taxes and the State can not delegate it to anyone else (ie. a County, a City, etc). Then we get to (5) and AGAIN, it states the General Assembly(GA) shall NOT authorize any county, nor city to levy taxes on property.

In the above referenced portions of the NCSC, all taxes must also be ‘Uniform’ throughout the entire state. Are taxes the same, on a $125,000 residential homestead in say Carteret County as they are in Durham County? No they are not. For further proof of this, look at the tax rates at the following link;

http://www.dor.state.nc.us/publications/propertyrates.html

Here’s some sample data taken from the above link: 

From the 2002 – 2003 Tax Year:
Durham County: Durham

County-Wide Rate = .729       

City Rate =  .534

Total for all jurisdictions = 1.263

Carteret County: Beaufort

County-Wide Rate = .44         

Other Districts = .09

City Rate = .34

Total for all jurisdictions =.87   

Person County: Roxboro

County-Wide Rate = .67         

City Rate = .60

Total for all jurisdictions = 1.27

Orange County: Chapel Hill

County-Wide Rate = .805

Special School District = .202

City Rate = .504                        

Total for all jurisdictions = 1.511


From the 2005-2006 Tax Year:

Durham County: Durham

County-Wide Rate =  .8090

City Rate = .5830

Total for all jurisdictions = 1.3920

Carteret County: Beaufort

County-Wide Rate =  .4200

Other Districts = .0550

City Rate = .3800

Total for all jurisdictions = .8550

Person County: Roxboro

County-Wide Rate = .6500

City Rate = .6140

Total for all jurisdictions = 1.2640

Orange County: Chapel Hill

County-Wide Rate =  .8430

Special School District = .1834

City Rate = .5220

Total for all jurisdictions = 1.5484


 

Alright, enough on the NCSC items, now let us look at some of the NUMEROUS issues, and variations of the NC Tax Statutes (NCTS)

 

http://www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/ByChapter/Chapter_105.html

 

From the VERY TOP, the very 1st entry in list of statues;

 

 

Article 25.  Levy of Taxes and Presumption of Notice.

§ 105-1.1.  Supremacy of State Constitution.

The State’s power of taxation is vested in the General Assembly. Under Article V, Section 2(1), of the North Carolina Constitution, this power cannot be surrendered, suspended, or contracted away. In the exercise of this power, the General Assembly may amend or repeal any provision of this Subchapter in its discretion. No provision of this Subchapter constitutes a contract that the provision will remain in effect in future years, and any representation made to the contrary is of no effect. (2003-416, s. 12.)

 

See, it even states that NCSC is the ‘Law of the Land’ and that the NCGA can NOT contract it, nor surrender it, out to the cities & counties. If we read further through this enormous list of ‘Legalese’, there are numerous contradictions from one statute to the next…

 

 

For Example, “§ 105-275. Property classified and excluded from the tax base.” In here, section (16) says all NON BUSINESS PROPERTY is “Exempt” from Taxes. Now, ‘§ 105-275’ does exclude Motor Vehicles, Mobile Homes, Boats etc., from this exempt status, but NOT homesteads or Freeholds.  Then, as we look on, we find “§ 105-277.1.  Elderly or disabled property tax homestead exclusion”. 105-275 says all Non-Business Property is exempt from taxes, then §105-277.1 says ‘Elderly & Disabled’ folks get SOME relief from taxes. Which is it? Again, if you want to read these statutes, use the link above.

 



 

Now, onto the MAIN ISSUE of this blog post. A Korean War veteran (Charlie) is being harassed by the Durham County Tax Collector. He has lived at his current address since the early 1970s. Every year this Veteran has paid his taxes in full and on time. He is now 84 years old and is struggling to make ends meet. His income is Social Security, & he is fortunate enough to have a small pension from his former employer. He and his wife were so far below the ‘Poverty Line’, that back in 2004 or so, their tax preparer told them they didn’t even need to file tax returns any more. So they stopped filing.

 

Another Battle as already been fought with the NC Officials — Charlie & Henry won that WAR! Here is a brief write up on that one:

     

 

In 2009 Charlie’s wife passed away. In the latter part of 2011 or so, he got a letter from the NC Department of Revenue (NCDoR) saying he owed back taxes for several years. His son, Henry, got involved at this point. Henry, talked to their tax lady, and she said – “It’s Nothing, I’ll handle it”. So he thought that was that. About 8 months or so later, 2012 now, a 2nd NCDoR letter arrived again saying he owed back taxes. 2nd call to the tax lady. Again, she said she would “Handle It!” Another 6 to 8 months go by, a 3rd letter from NCDoR comes. Henry & Charlie went & met with the NCDoR folks. Henry explained that they were below all of the so-called ‘Poverty Levels’  income wise, and that the NCDoR had some bad info. The NCDoR folks didn’t buy it and they wanted past tax years filed. This process went on & on for almost a year.

 

Now, it’s 2013 —- So, at this point, since Henry’s mother was no longer with us, and she had kept the family’s books for all these years, Henry had to go to the IRS to get past wage statements for 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 & 2012 for both of his Mom & Dad (they always filed JOINTLY). This caused our dear veteran lots of stress thinking he owed a bunch of past taxes. The IRS didn’t like Henry’s ‘Power of Attorney’ docs (because his mother had passed and POAs stop at death). Henry fights with the IRS mouthbreathers and jumps through all of their hoops. Queue up the Federal Shutdown of 2013! The IRS offices were closed for over 2 & half weeks, yet the NCDoR was still breathing down their necks wanting this & that, and another form done… yada, yada, yada.

 

The Conclusion on this event: Our Korean Vet, Charlie, didn’t owe one red cent to the NCDoR. However, the family was out several hundred dollars getting these past Federal & State income taxes prepared for 2007 – 2012 years. Money that was ‘Thrown Away’ due to government incompetence. Now, Henry got really involved in the family’s finance stuff and on his own, has done TONS of research.

 



 

2013 & 2014 rolled around, and Henry discovered that they were paying approx $3,500 per year to the county & city of Durham. Charlie INSISTED that Henry pay them in full. Henry DID, but he fought his dad on this issue.  Henry kept on reading and studying on these tax things. The more he read, the madder he got.

 

So, that brings us to 2016. In January, Henry sent a nice letter to the Durham County Tax Office. He simply stated that he had been reading up and couldn’t find the ‘NC Law’ that authorized a COUNTY, or CITY, to levy Property Taxes. He included his findings from the NC Constitution (included at the beginning of this post) and asked the Durham County Tax Office to please respond, in writing, showing where they got their authority to tax, and that he was going to hold off paying Charlie’s taxes until the tax office satisfied his inquiry. He sent said letter via ‘Certified Mail’ so that he would have record of it.

As we’ve learned earlier here, THAT power lies with the STATE of North Carolina Only!

 

Then, on Saturday May 28, 2016, the Saturday on Memorial Day Weekend, the mailman rings the doorbell & delivers a ‘Certified Mail’ from one Ms. Kimberly Simpson of the Durham County Tax Office. This is the 1st communication from the Durham County Tax Office since Henry’s letter to them in January 2016. Charlie gets ALL UPSET because they are claiming to start a Foreclosure Preceding & Seize his bank accounts if the tax is not paid within 10 days. Henry looks at the letter.

May252016SimpsonLetter05

Scan of the May 28, 2016 Letter from the Durham County Tax Office

 

 

May252016SimpsonLetter03

Backside of Letter Image 01

 

 

May252016SimpsonLetter04

BackSide of letter image 2: You can tell it has been photocopied numerous times by the broken up, washed out text.

 

The letter appears to be a ‘Form Letter’ that is a “COPY, OF A COPY, OF A COPY”, and on the backside 2 general statutes are listed — 105-366 & 105-368. The 2 general statutes are not even complete because the multi-copies have lost some of the text on the right hand side. 105-366 stops at (b)9, yet the full statute continues with subsections of (c) & (d). 105-368 stops at (e), yet the actual law, it continues on with subsections (f) through (i). The front side of the letter, other than the pertinent account information, is washed out too. Even the tax department logo at the top is ‘Splotchy’. Plus there is no actual signature nor any official stamp. Is this how you run a government office?

                        

HELP WANTED: Is there any veteran’s groups, or other folks out there, that might could assist this Veteran with this issue? Any information would be helpful. Any Constitutional Attorneys out there that could provide some feedback or assistance?

I have looked over Henry’s findings, & I too agree with him. It does appear that the City & County of Durham is out of their jurisdiction on this issue. Why else would they NOT answer a January certified letter, but yet wait until a long weekend to send out the ‘Threats’? If they were ACTUALLY authorized to levy taxes, one would think a response letter would have been sent to Charlie & Henry stating something along the lines of — “Sir, As per your letter of January 6, we would like to direct you to North Carolina General Statute ABC-123, which authorizes the Durham County Tax Collector to levy taxes on your property. Please include your prompt payment on this matter to avoid any further actions by this office.”

 

That would have been the end of this issue. The lack of a response is really the disturbing part. Keep in mind now, Durham NC is very liberal — It’s a ‘Sanctuary City’ for Illegal Aliens; It welcomes Terrorist Refugees; and is basically the San Francisco of the east coast. Crime rates are out of control and the entire City Council, Mayor, County Commissioners & all leaders are democrats. Durham’s U.S. Congressmen are David Price & G.K. Butterfield. Need I say more?

Again, any assistance would be helpful. Please leave a comment if you can help, with some sort of contact information so we can get back to you. I will not publish any phone numbers or email addresses once I approve your comment. Or comment even if you have information that states Henry & I are completely WRONG on this!

 

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Thirtieth Day of May in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen.  Memorial Day 2016

 


 

BARAttorneysNoAuthority

 

 

http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/attorneys-have-no-legislative-authority-in-courtrooms/

 

B.A.R. ATTORNEYS ARE SELF APPOINTED AND HAVE NO LICENSES

 

 

Connecticut Attorney, Simeon E. Baldwin, invited a group of 100 Attorneys from 21 states and the District of Columbia to meet on the 21st day of August of 1878, at Saratoga Springs, New York, to organize the American B.A.R. Association.  Most of the men were elite corporate lawyers.  Author Jethro K. Lieberman described early ABA membership: “You could become an invitee to membership if you were white, Protestant and native born, preferably with a British surname, and attended the elite law schools such as Harvard, Yale and Columbia; only then did you have a chance of prospering. Catholics, Jews, women and blacks were automatically excluded from membership. This exclusion was necessary to the elite bar’s sense of identity. Any fraternity is defined not only by whom it accepts but also by whom it excludes. The Association also pinned the stigma of immorality on the lower class of lawyers as shysters who talked, dressed and acted differently.”

 

In 1902 the ABA quit meeting regularly at Saratoga Springs; from that point to 1936 it met in different cities as a means to attract new members.  Thus ABA membership grew to 29,008 in 1936. Other statistics demonstrated the same story.  The bar went from just two sections, each with two officers, to 14 sections with 960 officers in 1935. The number of committees rose from 18 in 1902 to 27 in 1935.  Membership revenues in those years increased from $8,255 to $197,877.66. 

 

The ABA’s fight against the New Deal led more liberal attorneys to start their own society called the National Lawyers Guild.  A mixture of populists, Marxists, and progressive attorneys, mostly on the East Coast, formed the guild in 1937. This move was also motivated by the fact that the ABA represented a largely elite base of lawyers associated with big business while ignoring the legal needs of the lower classes and minorities.

 

In 1950, the 81st Congress investigated the Lawyers Guild and determined that the B.A.R. Association is founded and run by communists under definition. Thus, any elected official that is a member of the B.A.R. will only be loyal to the B.A.R. and not the people.

 

Black’s Law Dictionaries 4th, 3rd, 2nd and 1st: “Lawyers:  A person learned in the law as an attorney, counsel, or solicitor, a person licensed to practice law, any person for who for fee or reward, prosecutes or defends, causes in courts of record, or other judicial tribunal, of the United States, or of any other State, or whose business it is to give legal advice, in relation to any case or matter, whatsoever.”  (Act of July 13, 1866 – Section 9, 14 Statutes at Large 121)

 

The B.A.R. Association has no Legislative Authority to have been created.  They’re a private corporation.  The Attorners are self appointed!  They gave themselves their authority, and they’re using fraudulent Statutes.  They just came in, took over, and they’re taking full advantage of the fact that no one will dig and read their real history. 

 

THERE IS NO SUCH STATUTE IN THE STATUTES AT LARGE!!!  THE B.A.R. IS A PRIVATE INDUSTRY, A PRIVATE ASSOCIATION.  They’re trying to make everyone believe they have Congressional Authority, that they simply do not have.

 

Where in the Statutes at Large were Lawyers, most especially Crown Temple B.A.R. Attorners, ever given the authority to practice law in the courtroom?  There isn’t even Legislative Authority for the International B.A.R., or the American B.A.R., the British Accreditation Registry, to be created, much less, authority to work in the courts, and to monopolize the courts.  They’re a private corporation, and they issue their own union cards, which they deceptively call “Licenses.”  Imagine a private Carpenter’s Union issuing their own licenses.  This type of monopoly is against the Taft-Hartley Act, The Clayton Trust Act, the Sherman Antitrust Act, and the Smith Act.  They’re a SELF-APPOINTED monopoly.  These are foreign Agents registered under F.A.R.A. 

 

As the years passed, these foreign Agents managed to get themselves unlawfully into Offices of Trust so they could shape statutes and codes to suit their agenda, rendering all their unconstitutionally created garbage, null and void, nunc pro tunc.

 

Article XIII put the teeth into this:

 

Article I, Section 9, Clause 8:  “No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.”

 

Article XIII  “If any citizen of the United States shall Accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”

 

Do you have an understanding of what is meant when the original Article XIII says, “such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.” Does it mean federal citizen of the United States only when it says, “under them, or either of them.” Doesn’t that mean federal (corporation) United States and also unincorporated United States?  So as anyone can read, especially the fraudsters who claim to have gone to law school, THEY’RE NOT ALLOWED TO DO ANY OF THE THINGS THEY DO!  In 1871, the B.A.R. Attorners/Brokers for the Crown-Vatican-Swiss Banksters created a Military Coup on D.C., setting up the Bankster’s seizure of all commerce.  They’re foreclosed from partity with the living, so they created U.S. citizenship, so all U.S. citizens would be in contract with the Crown, as DEBTORS for the artificial BANKRUPTCY.  

 

A lawyer is some one who studies law. An attorney is someone who holds the profession of attornment, the taking of property, people and goods for it’s owner/master.

 

Under the Attorney General Manual, while under Martial Law Rule, section 3.2 – 110, History, all one needs is to be learned in the law, not Color of Law.

 

Every single court case has been based upon fraud.  No B.A.R. Attorner has any legislative authority to prosecute anyone in any court room.  The B.A.R. Attorners do not know law.  They cannot sit at the Bench.  They live in Color of Law!  the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Editions clearly are written to mislead the readers, alleging and suggesting they were created by Congressional Authority, but they weren’t.  Black’s Law 5th has no such history either – Attorney House Counsel, Right to an Attorney, Counsel, Section 9, 14 Statutes at Large 121 was REMOVED!!!  They’re a FRAUD!  No one masquerading as a “Judge,” or “government official” can produce proof of their delegation of authority.  There is no law allowing them to walk into the courtroom, much less to sit at a bench.  They have NO JURISDICTION!  They’re robbing America!  It’s a closed union shop, and an overthrow of our constitutional form of government.  All court cases are Piracy! 

 

The Crown Temple British Accreditation Registry is nothing but a continuing criminal enterprise.  They’re Administrating and monetizing everyone’s Estate Trust for the Bankruptcy created by the Crown Banksters.  They’re weaseling everyone’s consent into being collateral for the DEBT, without full and complete disclosure, under the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT OF 1913, after they set THEMSELVES up, for themselves, by themselves, with no lawful authority.  They’re imposters!  Black’s Law said they have authority, when they DON’T.  Under the Private Attorney General Act, the people can do what they do.  They have nothing!  They can’t claim the P.A.G. Act, but we can!

 

Color of Law, is NOT law.  It’s fiction for corporate fictions.  It’s time to prosecute them, under real law, for prosecuting living people under Color of Law.  Again, they’re TERRORISTS, for the foreign Crown Banks.  They are not qualified to hold Offices of Trust.  The Judiciary Act of 1789 created the lower Courts and the Office of Attorney General, but these offices are not to be filled by the B.A.R. Attorners.  The Administrative Procedure Act, Senate Bill 7, says we, people can walk into a Court to represent people, not B.A.R. Attorners.  The law says who can walk into the Courts, and that’s us.  

 

B.A.R. Rule 11: An Attorney cannot represent you!  Corpus Juris Secundum, volume 2, volume 4.  They have no duty to us.  They’re  also in violation of the Patriot Act, Section 800,  Title 18 USC 2331 – TERRORISM.  This violates Title 18 USC 241 and 242 – CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.  Also Title 18 USC 1621 – PERJURY.  Also Title 18 USC 1346 – HONEST SERVICE.  Also Title 18 USC 1918 – LOYALTY.  Felony after felony after felony!  In Black’s Law, the Attorneys who wrote the books quoted Section 9, 14 Statutes at Large 121 for “Lawyers” and it’s not even in there!  No matter where an Attorney is involved, in any type of case, it’s FRAUD.  Anything a Lawyer does in a Court room is a FRAUD.  They have no authority to sit at a Bench.  As soon as they tell you that you cannot bring law into the Court room, they just proved they have no Subject Matter Jurisdiction.  They’re nothing but foreign Agents under CITY OF LONDON. 

 

Title 31 USC 3729 – FALSE CLAIMS, EMBEZZLEMENT, FRAUD.

 

 

 

To demonstrate how rotten they really are, look at the material below:

 

Murdock vs. Pennsylvania explains that no State can make you get a license or pay a fee to exercise your rights.  Forcing someone to join the B.A.R.  and to get a license violates Murdock v.s Pennsylvania, and one’s rights under Article X.  The B.A.R. is under the Crown, not the united States of America.  In the July 1868 Congressional Record, the B.A.R. was never Ratified.  The B.A.R. issues it’s own B.A.R. Cards, not licenses, and their requirements are made by their Rules. 

 

The New Hampshire B.A.R. Supreme Court created it’s own rules for this requirement in the sneakiest way imaginable.  Article 73-a was added to the Constitution.  After the Article passed through the House, AFTER, they weaseled in a clause, “…Rules so promulgated shall have the force and effect of law.”  That’s how they coerce the B.A.R. agenda upon anyone who wishes to uphold the real rule of law over the foreign B.A.R. Courts. 

 

Well worth mention, there’s a STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Family Court “Rule 1.2 – Waiver of Rules.”  Their rules can be law, then they can waive their rules!  The B.A.R. does what it wants, while the people are oblivious. 

 

Now, the stinking B.A.R. is pushing U.N. upon us like no-one has ever seen before.  They’re nothing but Agents for the Crown-Vatican-Swiss Bankster whores who just cannot get enough.  These Pirates are robbing us of our lives.  They’re the ones stealing our homes in fraudclosure.  These are the Pirates stealing our kids.  They’re making money by putting people in prison for smoking a weed that grows in nature.  These creeps need to be prosecuted by everyone until they’re destroyed. 

 

If their authority is not created by law, then they’re not accountable to law.  This is why they rape and plunder everything and everyone.  They do whatever they please.  The only thing they’ll comprehend is PROSECUTION.  Demand their proof of Legislative Authority.  They want to prosecute people for practicing law without a license, when THEY DON’T HAVE ONE!!!  All they have is a stinking UNION CARD.  They’re nothing but two bit hoods.  If B.A.R. Attorneys had a real guts, they’d commit more respectable crimes, like snatching purses from little old grandmothers.  Show them no respect, because they don’t deserve any.  They’re ruining America for the Crown.

 

Much of the material in this Article comes from a great guy, Rod Class.  You’ll hear him in this Video.  This is very important.  Spread this to others, so they can discover Rod’s work.  Enjoy!

 

 

 

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Sixteenth Day of April in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen.


 

 

 

OK… I “THINK” I now understand the Colorado FIASCO.

The Timeline

August 2015 – There were 15+ candidates vying for the GOP ticket. At that point, there was ‘NO Leader of the Pack’. And there was no way of knowing WHO would be left standing come Spring ’16. Soooo, the Colorado GOP decided not to hold statewide caucus elections for the office of President.

http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_28700919/colorado-republicans-cancel-2016-presidential-caucus-vote

 

 

 

2012PopularVoteColorado

Popular POTUS Vote in 2012

 

 

Their reasoning, or lack thereof, was because in 2012, Santorum had won the ‘Primary/Caucus’ vote [The POPULAR Vote] and wasn’t in the running by the time the National Convention rolled around. Their delegates were ‘BOUND’ to Santorum. Santorum suspended his campaign August 10th 2012 but the GOP National Convention wasn’t until late August — 27th thru the 30th.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries,_2012

 

 

 

SOOooooo, the wise old owls of the Colorado GOP — correction, the BABOONS of the Colorado GOP — decided in August of 2015 to not allow the PEOPLE to have a voice in the nomination process this time around. We’re going to modify the rules so that precinct level Delegates ONLY make that call.

Now, allow me to explain the difference between ‘Delegate’ & ‘Voter’

Delegate = These are your folks that are REALLY INVOLVED in the local political party activities. They attend monthly Committee Meetings all year long, EVERY YEAR, & they set up the booths at local fairs, and enter floats in the various Parades — Locally. They are really INVOLVED. They go to city council meetings, school boards, Planning Commission Meetings, they follow the STATE LEVEL  activities as well. These folks are very few in numbers… compared to the masses.

Voter = This is your average John Q. Public. He, or she, works and takes care of the family. Little league games on Thursday evenings, Church 3 Sundays a month, helps little Suzy with her homework 4 nights a week, cuts the grass on Saturdays, cleans the gutters in the fall, maybe even is involved w/ the local Boy’s / Girl’s Scouting troop. There are about 5,000 of these to every ONE Delegate in your average metropolitan area. (maybe even more in some areas)

The ‘Voters’ were shut out in Colorado.

Colorado has 37 delegates in the Republican National Convention. 9 when it comes to the electorial college and the election of POTUS.

In comparison, NC has 72 national GOP delegates & 15 in the electorial college. We have 1,999,511 Registered Republican Voters here in NC (as of April 9, 2016)

 

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Twelfth Day of April in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen.


 

ConcealedCaryBadge

Permit no longer needed.

 

 

 

 

Great news on the 2nd Amendment Front!

 

       

Last week, Idaho’s Governor signed into law S1389. This law states that citizens have the RIGHT to carry (bear) firearms in a concealed fashion without having to be ‘Permitted’ by the Government.

 

 

Permitless carry has been in the making in Idaho for nearly five years. SB1389 will take effect July 1, 2016.

 

The bill passed out of the House State Affairs Committee by a vote of 13-4 (76%) and then was later passed by the full House by a vote of 54-15 (78%). Finally, it passed the Idaho Senate with a 27-8 (77%) vote.”

http://thewashingtonstandard.com/idaho-governor-signs-permitless-carry-law/

 

 

Now, I’d like to remind  you folks that because of Idaho, this law is Good & Valid throughout the entire country — The Supreme Court has already ‘Opined’ on this issue. Remember “Obergefell_v._Hodges” just last year?

‘Due Process’ & ‘Equal Protection’ Clauses?

(3) The right of same-sex couples to marry is also derived from the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection. The Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause are connected in a profound way. Rights implicit in liberty and rights secured by equal protection may rest on different precepts and are not always co-extensive, yet each may be instructive as to the meaning and reach of the other. This dynamic is reflected in Loving, where the Court invoked both the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause; and in Zablocki v. Redhail, 434 U. S. 374 , where the Court invalidated a law barring fathers delinquent on child-support payments from marrying. Indeed, recognizing that new insights and societal understandings can reveal unjustified inequality within fundamental institutions that once passed unnoticed and unchallenged, this Court has invoked equal protection principles to invalidate laws imposing sex-based inequality on marriage, see, e.g., Kirchberg v. Feenstra, 450 U. S. 455 –461, and confirmed the relation between liberty and equality, see, e.g., M. L. B. v. S. L. J., 519 U. S. 102 –121.


The Court has acknowledged the interlocking nature of these constitutional safeguards in the context of the legal treatment of gays and lesbians. See Lawrence, 539 U. S., at 575. This dynamic also applies to same-sex marriage. The challenged laws burden the liberty of same-sex couples, and they abridge central precepts of equality. The marriage laws at issue are in essence unequal: Same-sex couples are denied benefits afforded opposite-sex couples and are barred from exercising a fundamental right. Especially against a long history of disapproval of their relationships, this denial works a grave and continuing harm, serving to disrespect and subordinate gays and lesbians. Pp. 18–22.


(4) The right to marry is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of the person, and under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment couples of the same-sex may not be deprived of that right and that liberty. Same-sex couples may exercise the fundamental right to marry. Baker v. Nelson is overruled. The State laws challenged by the petitioners in these cases are held invalid to the extent they exclude same-sex couples from civil marriage on the same terms and conditions as opposite-sex couples. Pp. 22–23.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/576/14-556/

 

Let us re-write item 4 from above, shall we:

 

“(4) The right to carry concealed arms is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of the person, and under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, and within the plain wording of the 2nd Amendment, therefore citizens wishing to do so may not be deprived of that right and that liberty. Legal citizens may exercise the fundamental right to carry concealed arms without any infringements.”

 

 

 

IdahoGovernorConcealedCarryRight

Letter from Idaho’s Governor.

 

Links:

https://www.legislature.idaho.gov/legislation/2016/S1389.htm

 

http://www.boiseweekly.com/boise/permitless-concealed-carry-gun-bill-clears-committee-sent-to-idaho-house/Content?oid=3741834

 

 

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Twenty Ninth Day of March in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen.


Great little write-up here.

 

 

https://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/06/24/minor-v-happersett-is-binding-precedent-as-to-the-constitutional-definition-of-a-natural-born-citizen/

 

 

The 19th Amendment did not create a right to vote in the Constitution, the Amendment only protects against discrimination based upon sex once a state has granted persons the right to vote. This is an important distinction in that Minor v. Happersett’s ruling on voting rights is still good law and has not been superseded by the 19th Amendment.

 

VoteBooth

Voting is a ‘States Rights’ issue. States control the voting rules and the FEDS have no authority whatsoever over voting.

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010.

 

Natural Born Citizen

[UPDATED: Dec. 27, 2011 – See green text below regarding SCOTUS syllabus.  I have made corrections as explained below to my own error on the topic.]

[This is a follow up to my last report, US SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT STATES THAT OBAMA IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT. ]

[UPDATED – 8:32 PM June 24, 2011. Updated material appears below in red.]

Since my last report, many people have asked why the definition in Minor v. Happersett of a “natural-born citizen” (as a person born in the US to parents who are citizens) is binding legal precedent.  The answer is in the Court’s holding that Virginia Minor was a US citizen…because she was born in the US to parents who were citizens.  That part of the actual holding is listed in the official syallbus of the case.

And furthermore, Minor was the first case to hold that women…

View original post 2,075 more words

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 81 other followers