Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

                    

Dear Lady Infidels,

I would like to suggest that you two gals think about forming a Coalition. A coalition to defeat islam (lowercase on purpose — I have NO RESPECT whatsoever for islam nor any moslem) on American soil.

Both of you gals have received  death threats over your right to free speech. They have threatened you because you speak the TRUTH about the savages who follow islam & the quran.

I would urge you two Lady Infidels to team up together and help each other spread the truth.

Respectfully,

SilenceDogood2010

      

And if you’d like to, order yourself a Jan Morgan inspired ring — ‘THE INFIDEL’!

sadkjfh

Click to enlarge.

Click to enlarge.

sdkfj

Order the ring at the link below.

http://libertyringco.com/products/the-infidel

dsafkj

sdkjfha

sdfa

Jan Morgan’s Website — http://janmorganmedia.com/

sdakfj

sdakfh

Pamela Geller’s Website — http://pamelageller.com/

sdfja

Click to enlarge.

Click to enlarge.

sdkfh

sdkfh

Cowboys_Muslims!sdakjf

ChalkWinner

sadkfh

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Eleventh Day of May in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fifteen.


Plantation Owners (Gov't Officials) holding slaves (Sheeple) for their safety. Image copied from Google via ABC13. Click to enlarge

Plantation Owners (Gov’t Officials) holding slaves (Sheeple) for their safety.
Image copied from Google via ABC13. Click to enlarge

Last night during a planned event at the Curtis Culwell Center in Garland, Texas, 2 men pulled up and open fire outside of the center. They were both killed after injuring an ISD Security Guard who was posted outside of the center.

sdkjh

kdslfh

I’m like Ivory Snow — 99.97% POSITIVE that the ‘Majority’ of our Lame Stream Media will not report these attackers as being Islamic Jihadis. It’s already been reported that one of the men was already being investigated for his link to terrorism;

“A senior FBI official has confirmed that one of the suspects in the attack in Garland has been identified as Elton Simpson, an Arizona man who was previously the subject of a terrorism investigation, ABC News reports.”

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/local-news/20150503-breaking-gunfire-reported-at-anti-islam-event-at-garland-isd-facility.ece

dsjf

I’m sure that little piece of info above will be edited / changed shortly.

eriuu

Elton Simpson ABC11 Photo.

Elton Simpson ABC11 Photo.

lksdfh
A little more on Mr. Simpson. He wanted to go to Somalia back in 2010 and was stopped. Hummm…. What is so attractive about Somalia I wonder???

dsfd

Screengrab from the court document on Mr. Simpson's case. Click to enlarge.

Screengrab from the court document on Mr. Simpson’s case. Click to enlarge.

sdjkf

sdkjfjah

http://www.scribd.com/doc/264047709/Elton-Simpson-Terror-Investigation-Document

skjsfa

sdafj

FLASHBACK to January 2015 —

‘Stand With the Prophet in Honor and Respect’ conference was promoted by Sound Vision Foundation.

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/community-news/garland-mesquite/headlines/20150118-protesters-picket-islamic-conference-in-garland.ece

dskjafh

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/01/stand_with_the_prophet_in_honor_and_respect_conference_in_texas.html

sdfkajh

During these islamic events people peacefully protested. They didn’t start shooting. They didn’t Riot. They didn’t even loot one single pair of Air Jordans nor did a single car / business get burned! They were however slightly harrassed by the local LEO’s to keep moving. These LEOs were following their orders placed upon them by the local Chickens**t Leaders to appease the muslim THUGS who were organizing the event.

~~~~

Here’s a little tidbit from 2013 on Garland via a whiney dhimmicrat!

If you want to see how bad it can get, look at the local elections for where I live. Garland Texas is a minority/majority community with only 36% white/non-latino. The rest are Latino, African-American, and Asian. In our last election for mayor (although supposedly “bi-partisan”) the richest whitest Republican was elected mayor.

sdkajf

kjsdaf

OK OK —- I’ll move onto my POINT!

Oblio & Arrow from the Land of Point.

Oblio & Arrow from the Land of Point.

dsakljf

I posted yesterday about the Mayhem in Baltimore. In that post I asked what was next?

sdkjf

I think we’re seeing what’s NEXT —- Last night in Garland was a good DRY RUN on inflicting Martial Law. Even though only the 2 thugs were killed, Texas proved, that even as GREAT as TEXANS are, they are NOT PREPARED.

dddsad

sdafh

When the “Plantation Overseers” —- errr the SWAT TEAM & LEOs — came into the Curtis Culwell Center, the sheeple quietly stayed in place and hopped onto the buses to be evacuated to the local school.
They could have taken these 200 attendees straight to the GAS CHAMBERS, or to the RAIL CARS to be transferred later to Auschwitz … errr FEMA Camps.

sdkjfjahdsk

Auschwitz Concentration Camp

Auschwitz Concentration Camp

sdfj

jakf

Never, Ever Place Yourself in a Situation where you are reliant on someone else for your own Protection. NEVER!

    

sdkjjfa 

dsjf

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Fourth Day of May in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fifteen.

 


We are being played once again folks. I will try to keep this as short as possible, but there is just way too much information to give you only ‘Bits & Pieces’ of it. Besides, if you’ve ever read SilenceDogood2010 before, you are already well aware that I like to be thorough in my reports.

OK — 1st off you need to be aware that Baltimore’s Mayor, Stephanie Rawlings-Blake is also a member of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. She provided testimony in January 2015 to the committee.

werewrt
Link to the 2 page PDF Filehttp://www.cops.usdoj.gov/pdf/taskforce/submissions/SRB-21st-Century-Task-Force-Testimony.pdf
sdkjdhf

sdlakjfhas

Notice the Document Properties and this was created in Jan. 2015. Click to enlarge.

Notice the Document Properties and this was created in Jan. 2015. Click to enlarge.

Now, lets delve into some history of the “COPS” Program (Community Oriented Policing Services) that was started during the Clinton Administration.

hgfs

http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/

vcfgfh

1994 – COPS was passed by the House & Senate — Total Appropriations $8.8B

COPS 1994 Image. Click to enlarge.

COPS 1994 Image. Click to enlarge.

1994 – $148.4M


1995 – Budget increased to $1.3B (over 9X increase from the previous year)

1996 – $1.4B

1997 – $1.42B

1998 – $1.63 B

1999 – $1.46B

Lets fast forward a few years

2006 – $472M

2007 – $541M

2008 – $587M

2009 – $1.55B (Almost 3X increase in one year)

ghdf

ksadjhf

sjdkf

And the Task Force Doc. Properties --- March of 2015. Click to enlarge.

And the Task Force Doc. Properties — March of 2015. Click to enlarge.

 

I think you get my point…

So, our local PD’s & LEO’s have some great equipment & training and NOW they, the socialists / liberals, aren’t happy and want the feds to take over the local jurisdictions. When has that ever worked throughout history?? Oh yeah… Germany during the 30’s & 40’s.

So, we’ve established Ms. Rawlings-Blake role, now let’s look at one Marilyn Mosby — She’s the State Attorney for Baltimore City (like a local District Attorney in most places) AND she is married to a Baltimore City Councilman. Mr. Mosby, the Councilman, was part of the crew that told the BPD to ‘Stand Down’ during Monday night’s mayhem — Mr. Mosby & Mayor Rawlings-Blake. Remember TOO  that the Mayor stated she wanted “To give them room to destroy…” (Paraphrased)

fdgsdfg

dfssdfg

a Portion of the Fraternal Order of Police  Response to Ms. Mosby. Click to enlarge.

A portion of the Fraternal Order of Police Response to Ms. Mosby. Click to enlarge.

oieur

yeu

Col. Allen West has a link to the full FOP Letter to Mosby

As of Saturday Morning, May 2nd, This reporter has yet to see any charges that have been brought forth against any of the Rioters, Looters, or Arsonists. But she was “Johnny on the Spot” to charge 6 LEO’s.

eoryt

SilenceDogood2010’s Op Ed & Summary: We have a handful of democrat elected officials (Elijah Cummings, Rawlings-Blake, and both of the Mosbys) in the Baltimore area that are not only incompetent, but it appears that they are conspiring  to destroy an entire city and possibly the entire nation. In my honest opinion, they are working with the Traitors in the White House, BHO & Valerie Jarrett, to divide the American People and to bring MAYHEM across our Great Republic. We already know that Mr. Obama, (or Soetoro, or whatever his name really is) is NOT a Natural Born Citizen (via the Constitutional Requirement) and is not eligible to occupy the White House. All of his supplied documents have been proven as forgeries. We know how evil Ms. V. Jarrett is on all fronts — We know that Mr. Cummings conspired with Lois Lerner at the IRS to pressure conservative groups — We know that rampant voter fraud was used throughout the USA during both the 2008 AND 2012 general elections, especially in liberal democrat controlled areas. We also know that Attorney General Eric Holder was held in CONTEMPT of CONGRESS  and was never prosecuted… nor will he be. The entire administration is fighting with various states that are trying to clean up the voter rolls, and that the DHS / Sec. Jeh Johnson is approving 100’s of THOUSANDS of Illegals as I type this blog. We have John Kerry creating GLOBAL MAYHEM with his actions in Iran, Russia & other foreign policy areas. We have Hillary R. Clinton deleting Gov’t emails that were under subpoena. We have civil unrest due to 4 criminals (Michael Brown, Eric Garner, Trayvon Martin, & Freddie Gray) being killed while resisting arrest. 

oiiru

What is NEXT? Can you say the suspension of elections & Martial Law imposed all across the United States of America before the November 2016 elections get here?

Our fine NC Governor Bev Perdue called for “Suspension of Elections” back in 2011.

eriyt

“These are the times that try men’s souls.” ~ Thomas Paine.

reiutyew

lksdfh

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Second Day of May in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fifteen.


Rick Barclay (Owner of the Sugar Pine Gold Mine) & some of the III Percenters that have joined him to protect his property from the BLM.

Rick Barclay (Owner of the Sugar Pine Gold Mine) & some of the III Percenters that have joined him to protect his property from the BLM.

Please SHARE widely!

Young Turks Media Exposed as a Huge Disinformation Media Outlet!

Rally @ Biddle in Medford, Oregon! Thursday 4/23/15! 12:00 noon!

Follow Link to Website!

http://oathkeepersjoco.com/

Directions:
I5 – Exit 61
West on Merlin / Galice Road
Right at 1st stoplight – Monument Drive
Right onto California Ave, to the end.
~~~~~~

Some basic information for those who aren’t familiar with this issue.

The BLM, Bureau of Land Management is trying to take over a private Gold Mine in Oregon. Rick Barclay, the owner of the Sugar Pine Mine, has been fighting these gov’t tyrants for some time now. Things have escalated in recent weeks and Barclay asked for help. Oathkeepers responded but they need more people AND more AWARENESS of the issue.

The MSM is silent on this for now. If anyone has contacts with Breitbart, Blaze, Fox News, Rush, or any media… please get this info to them.

csa

das

Some HISTORY of the Mine. Been there long before BLM was ever established.

http://sugarpinemine.blogspot.com/p/whats-going-on-in-galice-whole-story.html

sd

dshj

dskj

I’ll update here as things progress.

ytre

trew

fdas

uiytr

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Twenty First Day of April in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fifteen.


sdasd

as

Our dear ol’ NC State Senator is at it once again. I’m talking about Senator Floyd McKissick from Durham NC. asds

Check out what he has now. An Egyptian National as his Senatorial Intern??? HUH???  Were there NO AMERICANS available for this learning experience? Or did he seek & search out a muslim to fit in with the Diversity Crowd?

asdaa

asd

Disclaimer: This posting is STRICTLY my sole opinion and my comments are made to get YOU — THE READER — To put on your thinking caps and make up your OWN MINDS.

assaaf

saadg

1st — Senator McKissick posted this on his Facebook page —  a photo of his new Intern. He’s so proud! asda

Click to enlarge the image.

Click to enlarge the image.

adsfg

Here’s the actual text of the caption he posted too…

Meet Noreen, one of my Senate Interns this year, who’s a senior at Meredith College where she is completing a double major in Political Science and International Studies. Noreen is originally from Egypt. She is extraordinarily intelligent, motivated and fascinated with politics and public policy. She also has an amazing sense of humor and a positive working attitude. I am indeed fortunate to have her assistance in my Senate office — with Noreen Elnady.

gfhj

Maybe it is JUST ME, but with ISIS running wild in the middle east, decapitating Christians at will & burning people alive while locked in a cage — With BOKO HARAM in Northern Africa (Note: Egypt is ALSO Northern Africa) kidnapping young girls and forcing them into the SEX SLAVE TRADE — With Islamic Mullahs in Iran calling for the killing of all Americans, Please forgive me if I DO NOT LIKE having any muslim, In ANY POSITION with any power whatsoever.

oeiruq

Que up the liberal talking heads — “Interns don’t have any power!” — Maybe they don’t, but they are right there with access to documents, answering phones & taking messages (or NOT taking proper messages) and they can talk directly into the ears of those with ACTUAL POWER! I think the term is called … INFILTRATION!

  

hgfdx

    

    

2nd — ALL MUSLIMS practice what is known as Taqiyya & Kitman – The practice of Deceiving, or lying, to prevent persecution of your beliefs.    

ytre

TaqiyyaKitmanGraphic trw TaqiyyaGraphic01 ewrity

    

Here is some more info I was able to dig up on Ms. Elnady.

yte

Her Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/noreen.elnady

poire

If you go to her FB page, you will see that she stands with her muslim brothers & sisters. Don’t take MY WORD for it… Go see for yourself. Here are a couple of screengrabs for you (Click on either image below to enlarge it);

sadfh

ureyt

sdyurt

FloydInternFB_HKOJ FloydInternFB_Hallelujah

34865

poewuy    

Now, lets review just ONE of Ms. Elnady’s FB threads from January 10, 2015. Below I’m adding 3 separate images from that thread. Again, I report — YOU DECIDE! (Click any image to enlarge it) 

efwer

kjer

FloydInternFB_Jan10thFBPost01fdjjh

FloydInternFB_Jan10thFBPost02dsfj

FloydInternFB_Jan10thFBPost03ewiyertiy

shd

Her Twitter page: https://twitter.com/noreeniebeenie

ScreenGrab from her twitter page. Click to enlarge.

ScreenGrab from her twitter page. Click to enlarge.

gfds

sadf

And she seems to be a fan of the United Nations too. Taking an ACTIVE part in a mock UN Council event about a Crisis Simulation.

hfd

dskj

With McKissick’s history, I wouldn’t trust him to

make any good decisions on any topic whatsoever!

trew

dfkj

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Twentieth Day of April in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fifteen.


William H. Taft

William H. Taft

With the passing of TAX DAY 2015, I decided to delve into some background of how & why the 16th Amendment, and the creation of the IRS, came to pass. I started my search by seeing what was available on the arguments, and the development of the Senate Joint Resolution 40 — S.J.R. 40 is what was sent to the states for ratification. We already know that only 4 states properly ratified S.J.R. 40.

S.J.R. 40 Click to enlarge the image.

S.J.R. 40
Click to enlarge the image.

Below, I will go into some detail on what President W.H. Taft had asked of the congress and the meanings and intent of the 16th Amendment.

Source

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD – SENATE – JUNE 16, 1909

[From Pages 3344 – 3345]

The Secretary read as follows:

To the Senate and House of Representatives:

It is the constitutional duty of the President from time to time to recommend to the consideration of Congress such measures, as he shall judge necessary and expedient. In my inaugural address, immediately preceding this present extraordinary session of Congress, I invited attention to the necessity for a revision of the tariff at this session, and stated the principles upon which I thought the revision should be affected. I referred to the then rapidly increasing deficit and pointed out the obligation on the part of the framers of the tariff bill to arrange the duty so as to secure an adequate income, and suggested that if it was not possible to do so by import duties, new kinds of taxation must be adopted, and among them I recommended a graduated inheritance tax as correct in principle and as certain and easy of collection.

The House of Representatives has adopted the suggestion, and has provided in the bill it passed for the collection of such a tax. In the Senate the action of its Finance Committee and the course of the debate indicate that it may not agree to this provision, and it is now proposed to make up the deficit by the imposition of a general income tax, in form and substance of almost exactly the same character as, that which in the case of Pollock v. Farmer’s Loan and Trust Company (157 U.S., 429) was held by the Supreme Court to be a direct tax, and therefore not within the power of the Federal Government to Impose unless apportioned among the several States according to population. [Emphasis added] This new proposal, which I did not discuss in my inaugural address or in my message at the opening of the present session, makes it appropriate for me to submit to the Congress certain additional recommendations.

Again, it is clear that by the enactment of the proposed law the Congress will not be bringing money into the Treasury to meet the present deficiency. The decision of the Supreme Court in the income-tax cases deprived the National Government of a power which, by reason of previous decisions of the court, it was generally supposed that government had. It is undoubtedly a power the National Government ought to have. It might be indispensable to the Nation’s life in great crises. Although I have not considered a constitutional amendment as necessary to the exercise of certain phases of this power, a mature consideration has satisfied me that an amendment is the only proper course for its establishment to its full extent.

I therefore recommend to the Congress that both Houses, by a two-thirds vote, shall propose an amendment to the Constitution conferring the power to levy an income tax upon the National Government without apportionment among the States in proportion to population.

This course is much to be preferred to the one proposed of reenacting a law once judicially declared to be unconstitutional. For the Congress to assume that the court will reverse itself, and to enact legislation on such an assumption, will not strengthen popular confidence in the stability of judicial construction of the Constitution. It is much wiser policy to accept the decision and remedy the defect by amendment in due and regular course.

Again, it is clear that by the enactment of the proposed law the Congress will not be bringing money into the Treasury to meet the present deficiency, but by putting on the statute book a law already there and never repealed will simply be suggesting to the executive officers of the Government their possible duty to invoke litigation.

If the court should maintain its former view, no tax would be collected at all. If it should ultimately reverse itself, still no taxes would have been collected until after protracted delay.

It is said the difficulty and delay in securing the approval of three-fourths of the States will destroy all chance of adopting the amendment. Of course, no one can speak with certainty upon this point, but I have become convinced that a great majority of the people of this country are in favor of investing the National Government with power to levy an income tax, and that they will secure the adoption of the amendment in the States, if proposed to them.

Second, the decision in the Pollock case left power in the National Government to levy an excise tax, which accomplishes the same purpose as a corporation income tax and is free from certain objections urged to the proposed income tax measure.

I therefore recommend an amendment to the tariff bill Imposing upon all corporations and joint stock companies for profit, except national banks (otherwise taxed), savings banks, and building and loan associations, an excise tax measured by 2 per cent on the net income of such corporations. This is an excise tax upon the privilege of doing business as an artificial entity and of freedom from a general partnership liability enjoyed by those who own the stock. [Emphasis added] I am informed that a 2 per cent tax of this character would bring into the Treasury of the United States not less than $25,000,000.

The decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Spreckels Sugar Refining Company against McClain (192 U.S., 397), seems clearly to establish the principle that such a tax as this is an excise tax upon privilege and not a direct tax on property, and is within the federal power without apportionment according to population. The tax on net income is preferable to one proportionate to a percentage of the gross receipts, because it is a tax upon success and not failure. It imposes a burden at the source of the income at a time when the corporation is well able to pay and when collection is easy.

Another merit of this tax is the federal supervision, which must be exercised in order to make the law effective over the annual accounts and business transactions of all corporations. While the faculty of assuming a corporate form has been of the utmost utility in the business world, it is also true that substantially all of the abuses and all of the evils which have aroused the public to the necessity of reform were made possible by the use of this very faculty. If now, by a perfectly legitimate and effective system of taxation, we are incidentally able to possess the Government and the stockholders and the public of the knowledge of the real business transactions and the gains and profits of every corporation in the country, we have made a long step toward that supervisory control of corporations which may prevent a further abuse of power.

I recommend, then, first, the adoption of a joint resolution by two-thirds of both Houses, proposing to the States an amendment to the Constitution granting to the Federal Government the right to levy and collect an income tax without apportionment among the several States according to population; and, second, the enactment, as part of the pending revenue measure, either as a substitute for, or in addition to, the inheritance tax, of an excise tax upon all corporations, measured by 2 percent of their net income.

Wm. H. Taft

Some more info from the above linked source

After we look at what our President proposed, the next thing we must look at to discern legislative intent are the Congressional debates on the Sixteenth Amendment in 1909. Three different written versions of the Sixteenth Amendment were proposed before the one we have now was approved by Congress and sent to the states for ratification. Below is a summary of each in written form:

Table 3-2: Versions of Proposed Sixteenth Amendment prior to approval.

2 SJR's Rejected and SJR 40 passed. Click to enlarge the image

2 SJR’s Rejected and SJR 40 passed. Click to enlarge the image

It can’t be any more clear. The 16th Amendment does not provide authority for a direct tax on incomes, but only authority for an indirect tax on incomes. A direct tax on incomes is a tax that diminishes the source of the income. An indirect tax on income is a tax on unearned income or profit; such a tax leaves the source of the income undiminished. Twice during the debates on the 16th Amendment (S.J.R. No. 25 and S.J.R. No. 39), Congress rejected the idea of bringing direct taxes within the authority of the 16th Amendment. Then twice more, on July 5, 1909, Congress rejected the idea by direct vote of the Senate. Despite this congressional hostility to the idea, the IRS and the lower courts admit they are collecting a direct tax. At a minimum this is scandalous. In reality it is probably criminal.

“Acts of Congress are to be construed and applied in Harmony with and not to thwart the purpose of the Constitution.” [Phelps v. U.S., 274 U.S. 341, 344 (1927)]

“Courts should construe laws in Harmony with the legislative intent and seek to carry out legislative purpose. With respect to the tax provisions under consideration, there is no uncertainty as to the legislative purpose to tax post-1913 corporate earnings. We must not give effect to any contrivance which would defeat a tax Congress plainly intended to impose.” [Foster v. U.S., 303 U.S. 118, 120-1 (1938)]

Just as the intent of the Congress should be followed when constructing a statute, so must the intent of the People, in their sovereign capacity, be followed when construing an amendment to the Constitution.

The construction of the 21st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution absolutely proves our argument. It was necessary for the 21st Amendment to repeal the 18th Amendment before the 21st Amendment could have any effect. Both Amendments related to “intoxicating liquors.” The 18th Amendment prohibited the manufacture, sale, or transportation or importation and use of them. Section 1 of the 21st Amendment reads “The eighteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.” The 21st Amendment would not have been in Harmony with the totality of the Constitution unless the 18th Amendment was first repealed. Similarly, had it been the intention of Congress to offer to the people an income tax amendment which would give Congress the power to impose a direct tax on the source of income without apportionment, the 16th Amendment would have provided for such power only by modifying the direct taxing clauses of the Constitution found at Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 and Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4. The 16th Amendment did not do this.

Section 2 of the 18th Amendment included an enforcement clause which read “The Congress and the several States shall have the concurrent power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.” The 21st Amendment did not include such an enforcement clause as the 21st Amendment was not conveying a new power to Congress, but in fact was adding a limitation on the power of Congress. Nor does the 16th Amendment have an enforcement clause, as it does not convey a new power to Congress, but only clarifies a theory of taxation. That theory was the basis for the Pollock Decision. The Pollock Decision was overturned by the 16th Amendment.

Congress did not modify the direct taxation clauses of the Constitution by the construction of the 16th Amendment. Therefore, the 16th Amendment does not provide authority for a direct tax on sources of income which enjoy constitutional protection. (Some sources of income do not enjoy constitutional protection, like income derived from sources without (outside) the several States of the Union.) Therefore, there is no authority for Congress to tax one of the several States of the Union, unless that tax is apportioned.

Here is a link to a 200 plus page PDF file that contains the actual Congressional Record — The arguments and debate on this issue. Below I’ve pulled out, and created a couple of screengrabs, for your reading enjoyment.

The images below came from PAGE 36 of the PDF file linked above:

         

Click to enlarge the image.

This image is from the SCOTUS (Justice Edward D. White’s Dissent) of the Pollock Case heard in 1895. In 1909, this was cited in the Senate during debate on the 16th Amendment.  Click to enlarge the image.

Click to enlarge the image.

Click to enlarge the image.

sdjkfh
sdhfjksd

sdfjhasdfh
If you want some MORE great info on Income Taxes, the 16th Amendment, Might I suggest you check out this video.
shkjs
sdkjfh

sdjkfha

sdkjfhdf

Misc. Links  

sadjfha

sdkkfjh

More info on Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. 157 U.S. 429 (1895)

sdkjkfhdsf

sdjfla

From Wiki, the case results — “The unapportioned income taxes on interest, dividends and rents imposed by the Income Tax Act of 1894 were, in effect, direct taxes, and were unconstitutional because they violated the rule that direct taxes be apportioned.”

sdkjfh

sdkjfh
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/157/429/case.html

              

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Sixteenth Day of April in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fifteen.


 

 

The following story is FICTION. All Photos are for illustration purposes only and were just downloaded off of Google Images. 

 

 

 

 

 

Omar the Tent Maker

Omar the Tent Maker

 

Omar Abdulah is a bright young tent maker in Pakistan in 1970. People heard of his quality tents from kilometers around and bartered for his goods. Soon, Omar had lots of trouble getting raw materials, and government thugs taxing him to pieces. So Omar had one of his poppy growing friends get him some fake documents (passports & such) and Omar immigrated to the USA illegally.

Omar, once here in the USA, found a nice community in the Dearborn, Michigan area. It was slowly becoming a Sharia haven and the Muslim Community was rapidly growing. Omar set up his tent making business in the back room of another mosque members store.

Things were going real well for Omar, his tents were of the same high quality as in Pakistan, and he had little to no trouble getting raw materials, and the local democrat government pretty much left him alone. He claimed only 10% of his total revenue when filing & paying his taxes each year. Omar was one happy camper…. Pun inTENTed!

Young Aaida

Young Aaida

 

 

 

This went on for about 3 years, then Omar met a lovely 8 year old American Born Girl, Aaida, & they were married. They moved to Canada to expand Omar’s tent business. In 1982 while in Canada, at 13 years old, Aaida had their 1st child — A Boy who they named Aladdin. They called him Al for short and thought this “American Name” would help him fit in with his rearing and Western Society.

Omar, Aaida & Al moved back to Michigan in the late 1980’s because they wanted Al to attend the fine American Schools.

 

 

Young Al 'Aladdin' Abdulah

Young Al ‘Aladdin’ Abdulah

 

 

 

Al was a fine boy by all measures; He studied the Quran & the Sunnah very hard. He also learned of the American customs and spoke like a typical Michigan native. Al worked hard after school to help Omar in the family tent business, which had expanded drastically. LL Bean was now one of Omar’s Primary Customers for his quality products. Al became very skilled in the practice of Taqiyya & Kitman, a Muslim tradition of deceit & untruths towards Infidels. This also helped Al, being one of Omar’s TOP Salesmen, promising deadlines that the company could never ever keep. Things were GOOD in the Abdulah household.

As the years passed, Al grew restless and as he became a teenager, he thirsted for more education. Al then went on to attend a prestigious law school in Boston Massachusetts at the age of 17. They had to pull some strings but CAIR, & the Local Muslim Brotherhood all supported the young Abdulah. Al was one sharp cookie alright. All of his teachers & college professors sang his praises.

After graduation from law school, with honors I might add, and after doing some legal wranglings for the muslim community in & around Dearborn & Chicago, Al landed a job in Washinton DC — The Nations Capital! Seeing his success, and after intense discussion with Al, Omar decided he needed to become a Naturalized US Citizen. Omar gained his US citizenship in 2010.

As the years passed, Al became a junior partner at the ‘Law Firm of Stoneher and Rapeher’ there in DC. He even argued several high profile cases before the US Supreme Court concerning Sharia Law.

He fought against the discrimination of pedophiles, and harsh sentences against them, which is nowadays defined as an ailment — not a crime. He fought to get ‘Sharia Compliant Zones’ set up all throughout the USA. He represented several of the ISIS detainees that we were holding in Guantanamo Bay and got them sent back home to Pakistan, Syria, & Iran. Al has done some great things for the Progressive Agenda over his lifetime.

Fast forward to the year 2036 – at 54 years old, Al decides to Run for the Democratic Nomination to the office of President of the United States.

 

 

 

 

Is Al ‘Aladdin’ Abdulah eligible for this high office?

Discuss…

    

 

 

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Thirty First Day of March in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fifteen.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 70 other followers