Connecticut Attorney, Simeon E. Baldwin, invited a group of 100 Attorneys from 21 states and the District of Columbia to meet on the 21st day of August of 1878, at Saratoga Springs, New York, to organize the American B.A.R. Association.  Most of the men were elite corporate lawyers.  Author Jethro K. Lieberman described early ABA membership: “You could become an invitee to membership if you were white, Protestant and native born, preferably with a British surname, and attended the elite law schools such as Harvard, Yale and Columbia; only then did you have a chance of prospering. Catholics, Jews, women and blacks were automatically excluded from membership. This exclusion was necessary to the elite bar’s sense of identity. Any fraternity is defined not only by whom it accepts but also by whom it excludes. The Association also pinned the stigma of immorality on the lower class of lawyers as shysters who talked, dressed and acted differently.”


In 1902 the ABA quit meeting regularly at Saratoga Springs; from that point to 1936 it met in different cities as a means to attract new members.  Thus ABA membership grew to 29,008 in 1936. Other statistics demonstrated the same story.  The bar went from just two sections, each with two officers, to 14 sections with 960 officers in 1935. The number of committees rose from 18 in 1902 to 27 in 1935.  Membership revenues in those years increased from $8,255 to $197,877.66. 


The ABA’s fight against the New Deal led more liberal attorneys to start their own society called the National Lawyers Guild.  A mixture of populists, Marxists, and progressive attorneys, mostly on the East Coast, formed the guild in 1937. This move was also motivated by the fact that the ABA represented a largely elite base of lawyers associated with big business while ignoring the legal needs of the lower classes and minorities.


In 1950, the 81st Congress investigated the Lawyers Guild and determined that the B.A.R. Association is founded and run by communists under definition. Thus, any elected official that is a member of the B.A.R. will only be loyal to the B.A.R. and not the people.


Black’s Law Dictionaries 4th, 3rd, 2nd and 1st: “Lawyers:  A person learned in the law as an attorney, counsel, or solicitor, a person licensed to practice law, any person for who for fee or reward, prosecutes or defends, causes in courts of record, or other judicial tribunal, of the United States, or of any other State, or whose business it is to give legal advice, in relation to any case or matter, whatsoever.”  (Act of July 13, 1866 – Section 9, 14 Statutes at Large 121)


The B.A.R. Association has no Legislative Authority to have been created.  They’re a private corporation.  The Attorners are self appointed!  They gave themselves their authority, and they’re using fraudulent Statutes.  They just came in, took over, and they’re taking full advantage of the fact that no one will dig and read their real history. 


THERE IS NO SUCH STATUTE IN THE STATUTES AT LARGE!!!  THE B.A.R. IS A PRIVATE INDUSTRY, A PRIVATE ASSOCIATION.  They’re trying to make everyone believe they have Congressional Authority, that they simply do not have.


Where in the Statutes at Large were Lawyers, most especially Crown Temple B.A.R. Attorners, ever given the authority to practice law in the courtroom?  There isn’t even Legislative Authority for the International B.A.R., or the American B.A.R., the British Accreditation Registry, to be created, much less, authority to work in the courts, and to monopolize the courts.  They’re a private corporation, and they issue their own union cards, which they deceptively call “Licenses.”  Imagine a private Carpenter’s Union issuing their own licenses.  This type of monopoly is against the Taft-Hartley Act, The Clayton Trust Act, the Sherman Antitrust Act, and the Smith Act.  They’re a SELF-APPOINTED monopoly.  These are foreign Agents registered under F.A.R.A. 


As the years passed, these foreign Agents managed to get themselves unlawfully into Offices of Trust so they could shape statutes and codes to suit their agenda, rendering all their unconstitutionally created garbage, null and void, nunc pro tunc.


Article XIII put the teeth into this:


Article I, Section 9, Clause 8:  “No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.”


Article XIII  “If any citizen of the United States shall Accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”


Do you have an understanding of what is meant when the original Article XIII says, “such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.” Does it mean federal citizen of the United States only when it says, “under them, or either of them.” Doesn’t that mean federal (corporation) United States and also unincorporated United States?  So as anyone can read, especially the fraudsters who claim to have gone to law school, THEY’RE NOT ALLOWED TO DO ANY OF THE THINGS THEY DO!  In 1871, the B.A.R. Attorners/Brokers for the Crown-Vatican-Swiss Banksters created a Military Coup on D.C., setting up the Bankster’s seizure of all commerce.  They’re foreclosed from partity with the living, so they created U.S. citizenship, so all U.S. citizens would be in contract with the Crown, as DEBTORS for the artificial BANKRUPTCY.  


A lawyer is some one who studies law. An attorney is someone who holds the profession of attornment, the taking of property, people and goods for it’s owner/master.


Under the Attorney General Manual, while under Martial Law Rule, section 3.2 – 110, History, all one needs is to be learned in the law, not Color of Law.


Every single court case has been based upon fraud.  No B.A.R. Attorner has any legislative authority to prosecute anyone in any court room.  The B.A.R. Attorners do not know law.  They cannot sit at the Bench.  They live in Color of Law!  the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Editions clearly are written to mislead the readers, alleging and suggesting they were created by Congressional Authority, but they weren’t.  Black’s Law 5th has no such history either – Attorney House Counsel, Right to an Attorney, Counsel, Section 9, 14 Statutes at Large 121 was REMOVED!!!  They’re a FRAUD!  No one masquerading as a “Judge,” or “government official” can produce proof of their delegation of authority.  There is no law allowing them to walk into the courtroom, much less to sit at a bench.  They have NO JURISDICTION!  They’re robbing America!  It’s a closed union shop, and an overthrow of our constitutional form of government.  All court cases are Piracy! 


The Crown Temple British Accreditation Registry is nothing but a continuing criminal enterprise.  They’re Administrating and monetizing everyone’s Estate Trust for the Bankruptcy created by the Crown Banksters.  They’re weaseling everyone’s consent into being collateral for the DEBT, without full and complete disclosure, under the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT OF 1913, after they set THEMSELVES up, for themselves, by themselves, with no lawful authority.  They’re imposters!  Black’s Law said they have authority, when they DON’T.  Under the Private Attorney General Act, the people can do what they do.  They have nothing!  They can’t claim the P.A.G. Act, but we can!


Color of Law, is NOT law.  It’s fiction for corporate fictions.  It’s time to prosecute them, under real law, for prosecuting living people under Color of Law.  Again, they’re TERRORISTS, for the foreign Crown Banks.  They are not qualified to hold Offices of Trust.  The Judiciary Act of 1789 created the lower Courts and the Office of Attorney General, but these offices are not to be filled by the B.A.R. Attorners.  The Administrative Procedure Act, Senate Bill 7, says we, people can walk into a Court to represent people, not B.A.R. Attorners.  The law says who can walk into the Courts, and that’s us.  


B.A.R. Rule 11: An Attorney cannot represent you!  Corpus Juris Secundum, volume 2, volume 4.  They have no duty to us.  They’re  also in violation of the Patriot Act, Section 800,  Title 18 USC 2331 – TERRORISM.  This violates Title 18 USC 241 and 242 – CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.  Also Title 18 USC 1621 – PERJURY.  Also Title 18 USC 1346 – HONEST SERVICE.  Also Title 18 USC 1918 – LOYALTY.  Felony after felony after felony!  In Black’s Law, the Attorneys who wrote the books quoted Section 9, 14 Statutes at Large 121 for “Lawyers” and it’s not even in there!  No matter where an Attorney is involved, in any type of case, it’s FRAUD.  Anything a Lawyer does in a Court room is a FRAUD.  They have no authority to sit at a Bench.  As soon as they tell you that you cannot bring law into the Court room, they just proved they have no Subject Matter Jurisdiction.  They’re nothing but foreign Agents under CITY OF LONDON. 






To demonstrate how rotten they really are, look at the material below:


Murdock vs. Pennsylvania explains that no State can make you get a license or pay a fee to exercise your rights.  Forcing someone to join the B.A.R.  and to get a license violates Murdock v.s Pennsylvania, and one’s rights under Article X.  The B.A.R. is under the Crown, not the united States of America.  In the July 1868 Congressional Record, the B.A.R. was never Ratified.  The B.A.R. issues it’s own B.A.R. Cards, not licenses, and their requirements are made by their Rules. 


The New Hampshire B.A.R. Supreme Court created it’s own rules for this requirement in the sneakiest way imaginable.  Article 73-a was added to the Constitution.  After the Article passed through the House, AFTER, they weaseled in a clause, “…Rules so promulgated shall have the force and effect of law.”  That’s how they coerce the B.A.R. agenda upon anyone who wishes to uphold the real rule of law over the foreign B.A.R. Courts. 


Well worth mention, there’s a STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Family Court “Rule 1.2 – Waiver of Rules.”  Their rules can be law, then they can waive their rules!  The B.A.R. does what it wants, while the people are oblivious. 


Now, the stinking B.A.R. is pushing U.N. upon us like no-one has ever seen before.  They’re nothing but Agents for the Crown-Vatican-Swiss Bankster whores who just cannot get enough.  These Pirates are robbing us of our lives.  They’re the ones stealing our homes in fraudclosure.  These are the Pirates stealing our kids.  They’re making money by putting people in prison for smoking a weed that grows in nature.  These creeps need to be prosecuted by everyone until they’re destroyed. 


If their authority is not created by law, then they’re not accountable to law.  This is why they rape and plunder everything and everyone.  They do whatever they please.  The only thing they’ll comprehend is PROSECUTION.  Demand their proof of Legislative Authority.  They want to prosecute people for practicing law without a license, when THEY DON’T HAVE ONE!!!  All they have is a stinking UNION CARD.  They’re nothing but two bit hoods.  If B.A.R. Attorneys had a real guts, they’d commit more respectable crimes, like snatching purses from little old grandmothers.  Show them no respect, because they don’t deserve any.  They’re ruining America for the Crown.


Much of the material in this Article comes from a great guy, Rod Class.  You’ll hear him in this Video.  This is very important.  Spread this to others, so they can discover Rod’s work.  Enjoy!





Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Sixteenth Day of April in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen.




OK… I “THINK” I now understand the Colorado FIASCO.

The Timeline

August 2015 – There were 15+ candidates vying for the GOP ticket. At that point, there was ‘NO Leader of the Pack’. And there was no way of knowing WHO would be left standing come Spring ’16. Soooo, the Colorado GOP decided not to hold statewide caucus elections for the office of President.






Popular POTUS Vote in 2012



Their reasoning, or lack thereof, was because in 2012, Santorum had won the ‘Primary/Caucus’ vote [The POPULAR Vote] and wasn’t in the running by the time the National Convention rolled around. Their delegates were ‘BOUND’ to Santorum. Santorum suspended his campaign August 10th 2012 but the GOP National Convention wasn’t until late August — 27th thru the 30th.





SOOooooo, the wise old owls of the Colorado GOP — correction, the BABOONS of the Colorado GOP — decided in August of 2015 to not allow the PEOPLE to have a voice in the nomination process this time around. We’re going to modify the rules so that precinct level Delegates ONLY make that call.

Now, allow me to explain the difference between ‘Delegate’ & ‘Voter’

Delegate = These are your folks that are REALLY INVOLVED in the local political party activities. They attend monthly Committee Meetings all year long, EVERY YEAR, & they set up the booths at local fairs, and enter floats in the various Parades — Locally. They are really INVOLVED. They go to city council meetings, school boards, Planning Commission Meetings, they follow the STATE LEVEL  activities as well. These folks are very few in numbers… compared to the masses.

Voter = This is your average John Q. Public. He, or she, works and takes care of the family. Little league games on Thursday evenings, Church 3 Sundays a month, helps little Suzy with her homework 4 nights a week, cuts the grass on Saturdays, cleans the gutters in the fall, maybe even is involved w/ the local Boy’s / Girl’s Scouting troop. There are about 5,000 of these to every ONE Delegate in your average metropolitan area. (maybe even more in some areas)

The ‘Voters’ were shut out in Colorado.

Colorado has 37 delegates in the Republican National Convention. 9 when it comes to the electorial college and the election of POTUS.

In comparison, NC has 72 national GOP delegates & 15 in the electorial college. We have 1,999,511 Registered Republican Voters here in NC (as of April 9, 2016)



Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Twelfth Day of April in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen.



Permit no longer needed.





Great news on the 2nd Amendment Front!



Last week, Idaho’s Governor signed into law S1389. This law states that citizens have the RIGHT to carry (bear) firearms in a concealed fashion without having to be ‘Permitted’ by the Government.



Permitless carry has been in the making in Idaho for nearly five years. SB1389 will take effect July 1, 2016.


The bill passed out of the House State Affairs Committee by a vote of 13-4 (76%) and then was later passed by the full House by a vote of 54-15 (78%). Finally, it passed the Idaho Senate with a 27-8 (77%) vote.”




Now, I’d like to remind  you folks that because of Idaho, this law is Good & Valid throughout the entire country — The Supreme Court has already ‘Opined’ on this issue. Remember “Obergefell_v._Hodges” just last year?

‘Due Process’ & ‘Equal Protection’ Clauses?

(3) The right of same-sex couples to marry is also derived from the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection. The Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause are connected in a profound way. Rights implicit in liberty and rights secured by equal protection may rest on different precepts and are not always co-extensive, yet each may be instructive as to the meaning and reach of the other. This dynamic is reflected in Loving, where the Court invoked both the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause; and in Zablocki v. Redhail, 434 U. S. 374 , where the Court invalidated a law barring fathers delinquent on child-support payments from marrying. Indeed, recognizing that new insights and societal understandings can reveal unjustified inequality within fundamental institutions that once passed unnoticed and unchallenged, this Court has invoked equal protection principles to invalidate laws imposing sex-based inequality on marriage, see, e.g., Kirchberg v. Feenstra, 450 U. S. 455 –461, and confirmed the relation between liberty and equality, see, e.g., M. L. B. v. S. L. J., 519 U. S. 102 –121.

The Court has acknowledged the interlocking nature of these constitutional safeguards in the context of the legal treatment of gays and lesbians. See Lawrence, 539 U. S., at 575. This dynamic also applies to same-sex marriage. The challenged laws burden the liberty of same-sex couples, and they abridge central precepts of equality. The marriage laws at issue are in essence unequal: Same-sex couples are denied benefits afforded opposite-sex couples and are barred from exercising a fundamental right. Especially against a long history of disapproval of their relationships, this denial works a grave and continuing harm, serving to disrespect and subordinate gays and lesbians. Pp. 18–22.

(4) The right to marry is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of the person, and under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment couples of the same-sex may not be deprived of that right and that liberty. Same-sex couples may exercise the fundamental right to marry. Baker v. Nelson is overruled. The State laws challenged by the petitioners in these cases are held invalid to the extent they exclude same-sex couples from civil marriage on the same terms and conditions as opposite-sex couples. Pp. 22–23.



Let us re-write item 4 from above, shall we:


“(4) The right to carry concealed arms is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of the person, and under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, and within the plain wording of the 2nd Amendment, therefore citizens wishing to do so may not be deprived of that right and that liberty. Legal citizens may exercise the fundamental right to carry concealed arms without any infringements.”





Letter from Idaho’s Governor.









Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Twenty Ninth Day of March in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen.

Great little write-up here.






The 19th Amendment did not create a right to vote in the Constitution, the Amendment only protects against discrimination based upon sex once a state has granted persons the right to vote. This is an important distinction in that Minor v. Happersett’s ruling on voting rights is still good law and has not been superseded by the 19th Amendment.



Voting is a ‘States Rights’ issue. States control the voting rules and the FEDS have no authority whatsoever over voting.

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010.


Natural Born Citizen

[UPDATED: Dec. 27, 2011 – See green text below regarding SCOTUS syllabus.  I have made corrections as explained below to my own error on the topic.]


[UPDATED – 8:32 PM June 24, 2011. Updated material appears below in red.]

Since my last report, many people have asked why the definition in Minor v. Happersett of a “natural-born citizen” (as a person born in the US to parents who are citizens) is binding legal precedent.  The answer is in the Court’s holding that Virginia Minor was a US citizen…because she was born in the US to parents who were citizens.  That part of the actual holding is listed in the official syallbus of the case.

And furthermore, Minor was the first case to hold that women…

View original post 2,075 more words





And on the 8th day, God looked down on his planned paradise and said, “I need a caretaker”

— so God made a Farmer.

God said, “I need somebody willing to get up before dawn, milk cows, work all day in the fields, milk cows again, eat supper, then go to town and stay past midnight at a meeting of the school board”

— so God made a Farmer.

“I need somebody with arms strong enough to rustle a calf and yet gentle enough to deliver his own grandchild; somebody to call hogs, tame cantankerous machinery, come home hungry, have to wait lunch until his wife’s done feeding visiting ladies, then tell the ladies to be sure and come back real soon — and mean it”

— so God made a Farmer.

God said, “I need somebody willing to sit up all night with a newborn colt, and watch it die, then dry his eyes and say, ‘Maybe next year.’ I need somebody who can shape an ax handle from a persimmon sprout, shoe a horse with a hunk of car tire, who can make harness out of haywire, feed sacks and shoe scraps; who, planting time and harvest season, will finish his forty-hour week by Tuesday noon, and then pain’n from tractor back,’ put in another seventy-two hours”

— so God made a Farmer.

God had to have somebody willing to ride the ruts at double speed to get the hay in ahead of the rain clouds, and yet stop in mid-field and race to help when he sees the first smoke from a neighbor’s place

— so God made a Farmer.

God said, “I need somebody strong enough to clear trees and heave bails, yet gentle enough to tame lambs and wean pigs and tend the pink-combed pullets, who will stop his mower for an hour to splint the broken leg of a meadow lark.”

It had to be somebody who’d plow deep and straight and not cut corners; somebody to seed, weed, feed, breed and rake and disc and plow and plant and tie the fleece and strain the milk and replenish the self-feeder and finish a hard week’s work with a five-mile drive to church; somebody who would bale a family together with the soft strong bonds of sharing, who would laugh, and then sigh, and then reply, with smiling eyes, when his son says that he wants to spend his life “doing what dad does”

— so God made a Farmer.


Rest in Peace Robert ’LaVoy’ Finicum

Paul Harvey – ‘So God Made a Farmer Speech’ to the FFA, delivered November 1978, Kansas City, MO  (Source)


Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this First Day of February in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen.





This is an image of what the BLM did to some of Ammon Bundy’s cattle. From 2014. [Image copied from WMD — http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/cattle-shot-buried-on-bundy-ranch/ ]

Let us review how many violations AGAINST the U.S. Constitution the federal government has committed in this particular operation.



The U.S. Constitution provides the federal government with ONLY a handful of powers. These are called the ‘Enumerated Powers’ and they are well defined. For those of you who might need a refresher (like you lawyers, FBI Agents, Sheriffs, & judges) — Here they are.




The Abuses


1) The Traffic StopThe Constitution does NOT provide the federal government the power to stop and detain ANYONE, for ANY REASON, while they are traveling within the borders of a sovereign state. Period!

2) The FBI as a wholeThe Constitution does NOT provide the federal government the power maintain a Domestic Law Enforcement Agency. See more here – Art. I, Sec. 8



3) The Department of the Interior (BLM) as a wholeThe Constitution does NOT provide the federal government the power to manage / control / regulate / nor occupy ANY LANDS whatsoever – Except for Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, Dockyards, etc. (see Art I, Sec 8, Clause 17 above)


4) The 4th & 5th Amendment ViolationsLet us review them shall we;




Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.




Question: Had the Local, or State officials, served these folks (Bundy, Finicum & the folks at the refuge) with ANY Warrants, or ANY Indictments from a Grand Jury?



Answer: NO.



“I’m pretty sure if I remember correctly everyone of our founding forefathers broke the then law of the land and were all, Everyone of them considered Traitors by the ruling government!! Or would be better off labeled terrorist as many are calling them by today’s standards!!” ~ William C. Robinson



Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Thirtieth Day of January in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen. 






Agents Mulder & Scully from the 2016 season.




With the uprising of the NEW X-Files series, I thought I would take a gander at the ‘HISTORY’ of the FBI.




Disclaimer: Old SD2010 here has a huge crush on Agent Scully.




Charles J. Boneparte (photo above) – The U.S. Attorney General under Teddy Roosevelt. Charles was the great nephew of Emperor Napoleon. On his own, but at the nudging of Teddy, Charles created what is now known as the Federal Bureau of Investigation. That’s right, the FBI.



The FBI is a completely ILLEGAL organization. Just dreamed up one night, and POOF, there it was.



As a matter of fact, the FBI was created on July 26, 1908, after Congress had left DC for the summer recess. Earlier that year, Teddy had asked Congress about creating something along the lines of a domestic law enforcement agency. Teddy was a little nervous due to McKinley being assassinated in 1901. That’s how Teddy got into the Whitehouse in the 1st place… He was McKinley’s VP. And on May 27, 1908, Congress had FORBIDDEN the Justice Department (the executive branch) to use any funds, or manpower to create this new agency. They feared it would create a ‘Secret Service’ type of unit.




Hummm, what do we have today????


As I read through Article I, Section 8 of the ‘Policy Handbook’ for our ‘Federal’ folks, — you know, that pesky rascal we call the U.S. Constitution — I can’t seem to find ANYWHERE in there the power for the federal government to do any DOMESTIC LAW ENFORCEMENT at all. The closest entity we have might be the U.S. Marshal Service… Which was created in 1789 — via the ‘Judiciary Act of 1789’  — to ONLY provide Law Enforcement over the U.S. District Courts. We will look at how much the U.S. Marshal Service has gotten out of hand at a later date.





So, as we settle into our recliners, with our bowl of popcorn, to enjoy the adventures of Mulder & Scully, the Cigarette Smoking man, Assistant Director Skinner, and other fond characters — remember, they are part of the tyranny that began long ago.


The TRUTH is out there — Trust no one!


Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Twenty Fifth Day of January in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 75 other followers