Feeds:
Posts
Comments

 

Again, let me start by saying that I like Ted Cruz. He’s a warrior for Liberty & a True Statesman.

Again, he is NOT ‘Constitutionally Eligible’ to hold the office of President of the United States. I’ll provide you with some additional information.

1st off — I hear lots of folks going on Mark Levin’s opinion. Mark is incorrect on this topic. Mark is using statements and quotes from the INA, Immigration & Naturalization Act. Don’t get me wrong here, I like Levin. I like him a lot. He’s a sharp guy…. but he is mistaken on this topic. Let’s focus on that to begin with…

 

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

 

The INA of 1952 is what was law when Ted Cruz  was born in 1970. It had been amended several times since it was originally drafted in 1795. The 1795 INA repealed the 1790 INA. Therefore the 1790 version is no longer applicable — Period. REPEALED.

Lets focus on the 1952 act and some of the debate about it —

 

 

It came into being despite heavy controversies between President Harry Truman and the House and the Senate. Truman vetoed the so-called McCarran-Walter Act (named after sponsors Senator Pat McCarran(D-Nevada) and Congressman Francis Walter (D-Pennsylvania)) because he regarded the bill as “un-American” and discriminatory. The two chambers neglected the president’s veto but applied some
changes to the bill.

Racial restrictions which previously existed were abolished in the INA, but a quota system was retained and the policy of restricting the numbers of immigrants from certain countries was continued. Eventually, the INA established a preference system which selected which ethnic groups were desirable immigrants and placed great importance on labor qualifications.

The INA defined three types of immigrants: 1. relatives of US citizens who were exempt from quotas and who were to be admitted without restrictions; 2. average immigrants whose numbers was not supposed to exceed 270,000 per year; 3. refugees.

The Act allowed the government to deport immigrants or naturalized citizens engaged in subversive activities and also allowed the barring of suspected subversives from entering the country. It was used over the years to bar members and former members and “fellow travellers” of the Communist Party from entry into the United States, even those who had not been associated with the party for decades.

“I believe that this nation is the last hope of Western civilization and if this oasis of the world shall be overrun, perverted, contaminated or destroyed, then the last flickering light of humanity will be extinguished. I take no issue with those who would praise the contributions which have been made to our society by people of many races, of varied creeds and colors. America is indeed a joining together of many streams which go to form a mighty river which we call the American way. However, we have in the United States today hard-core, indigestible blocs which have not become integrated into theAmerican way of life, but which, on the contrary are its deadly enemies. Today, as never before, untold millions are storming our gates for admission and those gates are cracking under the strain. The solution of the problems of Europe and Asia will not come through a transplanting of those problems en masse to the United States…. I do not intend to become prophetic, but if the enemies of this legislation succeed in riddling it to pieces, or in amending it beyond recognition, they will have contributed more to promote this nation’s downfall than any other group since we achieved our independence as a nation.” (Senator Pat McCarran, Cong. Rec., March 2, 1953, p. 1518.)

 

 

Now, lets look at the 1790 & 1795 acts.

 

1st the 1790 version:

 

United States Congress, “An act to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization” (March 26, 1790).

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof on application to any common law Court of record in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such Court that he is a person of good character, and taking the oath or affirmation prescribed by law to support the Constitution of the United States, which Oath or Affirmation such Court shall administer, and the Clerk of such Court shall record such Application, and the proceedings thereon; and thereupon such person shall be considered as a Citizen of the United States. And the children of such person so naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under the age of twenty one years at the time of such naturalization, shall also be considered as citizens of the United States. And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States: Provided also, that no person heretofore proscribed by any States, shall be admitted a citizen as aforesaid, except by an Act of the Legislature of the State in which such person was proscribed.

 

The above is the 1790 version created by the 1st Congress. The Repealed Act. Now, lets look at the 1795 version…

 

United States Congress, “An act to establish an uniform rule of Naturalization; and to repeal the act heretofore passed on that subject” (January 29, 1795).

For carrying into complete effect the power given by the constitution, to establish an uniform rule of naturalization throughout the United States:

SEC.1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any alien, being a free white person, may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States, or any of them, on the following conditions, and not otherwise: –

First. He shall have declared, on oath or affirmation, before the supreme, superior, district, or circuit court of some one of the states, or of the territories northwest or south of the river Ohio, or a circuit or district court of the United States, three years, at least, before his admission, that it was bona fide, his intention to become a citizen of the United States, and to renounce forever all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty whatever, and particularly, by name, the prince, potentate, state or sovereignty whereof such alien may, at that time, be a citizen or subject.

Secondly. He shall, at the time of his application to be admitted, declare on oath or affirmation before some one of the courts aforesaid, that he has resided within the United States, five years at least, and within the state or territory, where such court is at the time held, one year at least; that he will support the constitution of the United States; and that he does absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty whatever, and particularly by name, the prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, whereof he was before a citizen or subject; which proceedings shall be recorded by the clerk of the court.

Thirdly. The court admitting such alien shall be satisfied that he has resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States five years; and it shall further appear to their satisfaction, that during that time, he has behaved as a man of a good moral character, attached to the principles of the constitution of the United States, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the same.

Fourthly. In case the alien applying to be admitted to citizenship shall have borne any hereditary title, or been of any of the orders of nobility, in the kingdom or state from which he came, he shall, in addition to the above requisites, make an express renunciation of his title or order of nobility, in the court to which his application shall be made; which renunciation shall be recorded in the said court.

SEC. 2. Provided always, and be it further enacted, That any alien now residing within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States may be admitted to become a citizen on his declaring, on oath or affirmation, in some one of the courts aforesaid, that he has resided two years, at least, within and under the jurisdiction of the same, and one year, at least, within the state or territory where such court is at the time held; that he will support the constitution of the United States; and that he does absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty whatever, and particularly by name the prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, whereof he was before a citizen or subject; and moreover, on its appearing to the satisfaction of the court, that during the said term of two years, he has behaved as a man of good moral character, attached to the constitution of the United States, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the same; and when the alien applying for admission to citizenship, shall have borne any hereditary title, or been of any of the orders of nobility in the kingdom or state from which he came, on his moreover making in the court an express renunciation of his title or order of nobility, before he shall be entitled to such admission; all of which proceedings, required in this proviso to be performed in the court, shall be recorded by the clerk thereof.

SEC. 3. And be it further enacted, that the children of persons duly naturalized, dwelling within the United States, and being under the age of twenty-one years, at the time of such naturalization, and the children of citizens of the United States, born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, shall be considered as citizens of the United States: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons, whose fathers have never been resident of the United States: Provided also, That no person heretofore proscribed by any state, or who has been legally convicted of having joined the army of Great Britain during the late war, shall be admitted a citizen as foresaid, without the consent of the legislature of the state, in which such person was proscribed.

SEC. 4. And be it further enacted, That the Act intituled, “An act to establish an uniform rule of naturalization,” passed the twenty-sixth day of March, one thousand seven hundred and ninety, be, and the same is hereby repealed.

 

I want you to read CAREFULLY the purpose of the act! The very 1st statement made.

 

 

 

“For carrying into complete effect the power given by the constitution, to establish an uniform rule of naturalization throughout the United States:”

 

 

 

Read that again. Read it once more.
Three times is the charm.

 

~~~~~

2nd item — If the Natural Born Citizen Clause, of the Constitution, meant a single parent, or anyone just spit out within our borders, then why would THIS PIECE of legislation have been introduced in 2005? There were also several other similar bills introduced in years previous to 2005.

 

 

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

 

~~~~~

3rd item — Let us review the CRBA. It appears that Ted’s mother did NOT follow thru with these requirements or else he would have a 2nd Birth Certificate… one that was issued by the US State Department. Also to be noted, this falls once again under the INA. Not to be confused with the term “Natural Born Citizen” as stated in the US Constitution.

It appears that this reporting of births has been in use since at least 1910… According to Ancestry dot com.

 

Consular Report of Birth Abroad (CRBA)

A Consular Report of Birth (CRBA) is evidence of United States citizenship, issued to a child born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent or parents who meet the requirements for transmitting citizenship under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

CRBA applications must be made before the child’s 18th birthday, and we recommend that parents apply for the CRBA as soon as possible after the child’s birth. For applicants older than age 18 who have never been issued a CRBA, please refer to Possible Derivative Claim to U.S. Citizenship. Anyone who has a claim to U.S. citizenship must be in possession of a valid U.S. passport to enter and exit the United States, even if they have citizenship of another country, as well.

Eligibility for a CRBA

In order to determine whether or not the U.S. citizen parent(s) is/are able to transmit citizenship, please refer to the transmission requirements.

If the transmission requirements have been met, please submit the following in person at the Consulate General serving your area. For applicants living in areas where there is no consular presence, you may be eligible to submit your application during an ACS outreach program.:

The applicant (child) and at least one parent, preferably the U.S. citizen parent;
Completed (but not signed) CRBA application (Form DS-2029) — all questions must be answered. To assist, please see information to the right of this page regarding Listing times of Physical Presence in the U.S.;
If the U.S. Citizen parent is not able to attend the appointment, they must complete the Affidavit of Parentage, Physical Presence and Support, have it notarized by a Public Notary (in the U.S.) or Justice of the Peace (in Australia), which must be submitted in their absence;
Child’s Birth Certificate;
Parents’ registered marriage certificate (if applicable);
Evidence of termination of any previous marriages (if applicable);
American Citizen Parent(s)’ evidence of U.S. Citizenship (U.S. passport or naturalization certificate);
American Citizen Parent’s documentary evidence of physical presence in the United States prior to the child’s birth;
Self-addressed Express Post Platinum for the return of the passport and/or Consular Report of Birth Abroad – minimum A4 size. Please note: we are not able to accept Registered Post envelop to return documents;
Applicable Fee (All fees are subject to change without notice).

Parents are encouraged to apply for their child’s Social Security Number and first U.S. Passport at the same time as applying for their CRBA. Once you have completed all appropriate application forms and gathered all required supporting documentation, make an appointment to lodge the application. Please make sure you print your appointment confirmation to show to the Consulate Security.

If the U.S. citizen parent does not meet the transmission requirements and the child is under 18 years of age, the child may be eligible for expeditious naturalization under the Child Citizenship Act 2000.

 

 

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Twenty Seventh Day of March in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fifteen.


 

TedCruzBothSidesScared

 

 

First off, let me start by saying that I respect Senator Ted Cruz, and I think he is a true statesman & warrior for liberty. I honestly do. However, as much I like him, I still have the knowledge that he is not eligible to be the President of the United States under the Constitution’s eligibility clause. This post will go into great detail to educate my readers on the facts and the intent of the founders when they wrote the constitution.

Lets start with a short prayer & spiritual verse —

 

“Have nothing to do with foolish, ignorant controversies; you know that they breed quarrels. And the Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil, correcting his opponents with gentleness.” ~ 2 Tim 2:23   

 
Since Monday, March 23, 2015, when Senator Ted Cruz announced his candidacy for the POTUS, there are folks who are all on board with him and believe that he is eligible because they like him. There are also the liberal lefties that are yelling that he’s not eligible because they hate him. The republican establishment hates him too. Remember John McCain & the “Wacko Bird” comment last year? Planned Parenthood hates him. Whoopie Goldberg hates him.

All of these are GREAT REASONS to support him.

 

 

 

~~~~~

The Constitution and its meaning — “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

Now lets delve, in depth, on the meaning of Natural Born Citizen.

1st – The founders used a reference book called the ‘Law of Nations’ by Vattel.

“The citizens are the members of the civil society: bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or indigenes, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. . .”

 

Read more here.
Now I’ve seen several articles recently posted that argue that the word ‘indigenes’ was changed in Vattel’s english translation AFTER the constitution was written. “Indigenes” was changed to “natural born citizen” in 1797. Here’s one of those articles;

 

 

http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/09/natural-born-citizens-marco-rubio-bobby-jindal-ted-cruz/

 

 

Click any image to enlarge it.    

LegalInsurrection01

 

LegalInsurrection02

 

LegalInsurrectionBothParents01

 

“In 1775, Benjamin Franklin wrote a gracious note to Charles Dumas, for “the kind present you have made us of your edition of Vattel. It came to us in good season, when the circumstances of a rising state make it necessary frequently to consult the law of nations.” Franklin also stated that Vattel’s treatise was, “continually in the hands of the members of our Congress.” (From a letter, Benjamin Franklin to Charles Dumas, Dec. 19, 1775.) …”

     

[It is unknown whether or not the edition sent to Franklin was in English or French. Franklin could read both languages as could many of the founders.]

 

Vattel’s treatise was first published in 1758, in French. The first edition contains the exact same passage as the 1775 edition give to Franklin by Dumas. In 1759, the first English edition was published in London, translated as follows:

“The citizens are the members of the civil society : bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or indigenes, are those born in the country of parents who are citizens.” “The Law of Nations or Principles of the Law of Nature”, E. de Vattell, (London, 1759), § 212, pg. 92. (App. Pg. 159.)

“Les naturels, ou indigenes”, was not accurately translated. The proper translation of “indigenes” is “natives”. The 1759 London edition makes the mistake of repeating the same word twice, once in English and once in French; “natives or indigenes” means “natives or natives”.

The influence of the U.S. Constitution may have played a part in correcting the error, since, in the 1797 London edition, and thereafter, the French passage was correctly translated as follows:

“The citizens are the members of the civil society : bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country of parents who are citizens.” (Emphasis added.) “The Law of Nations or Principles of the Law of Nature”, E. de Vattell, (London, 1797), § 212, pg. 101.
(App. Pg. 161.)

 

Now let us look at the author

 

Jacobson is a 1981 graduate of Hamilton College and a 1984 graduate of Harvard Law School.

 

Jacobson goes on to say  —

 

Additionally, Vattel did not purport to explain the meaning of the term in the context of British law or the common understanding in the British American colonies or newly formed United States. It is, at best, highly speculative to assert that the Framers looked to Vattel for the definition of “natural born Citizen.”

 

Sorry if I don’t put ANY FAITH in what a Harvard Law Graduate has to say.

 

~~~~~
2nd item – People are claiming this is factual because of the “Legal Scholars” that wrote it.

Notice at the TOP it says — “Commentary by Neal Katyal & Paul Clement written March 11, 2015.”

Remember, Lawyers say things like, “It depends upon what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.

Yep, This is not liberal at all <sarcasm>
Let’s look at Neal Katyal for a moment — He’s Part of the Clinton & Obama Cabal.

And Paul Clement — He’s just another Indoctrinated Lawyer

 

~~~~~

 

 

3rd item – The founders while writing the Constitution, and the Federalist Papers, were well aware of the term “Natural Born Subjects” used in many historic documents.

As to the qualifications of members to sit at this board: any natural born subject of England is capable of being a member of the privy council; taking the proper oaths for security of the government, and the test for security of the church. But, in order to prevent any persons under foreign attachments from insinuating themselves into this important trust, as happened in the reign of king William in many instances, it is enacted by the act of settlement,l that no person born out of the dominions of the crown of England, unless born of English parents, even though naturalized by parliament, shall be capable of being of the privy council.
The rule of jus soli goes back to at least 508 BC in Athens, when it was used to establish citizenship in districts called demes. The Romans mainly used jus sanguinis to organize the empire into national groups each with its own legal system (although they had to introduce the office of praetor peregrinus to adjudicate disputes between members of different groups). However, the Edict of Caracalla in 212 AD made jus soli the rule for the entire Empire. The rule was carried to France and England under Roman domination, and the Normans adopted it and spread it to Scotland, Wales, and Cornwall.

However, jus sanguinis prevailed in many Eastern and Central European countries at the time Vattel wrote, and spread to other countries on the European continent. It displaced jus soli in Britain in 1983 and in France in 1993, mainly in response to immigration of persons of different ethnicity.

On July 25, 1787, John Jay wrote to George Washington, presiding officer of the Convention:

Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government, and to declare expressly that the Command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.
Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz

Born December 22, 1970, in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, of a father who was a citizen of Cuba, and a mother who was a citizen of the U.S.

Sen. Cruz is not eligible to be president…

 

 

Jon Roland Bio

 

~~~~~

 

4th item – Those arguing the Naturalization ACT, or the 14th Amendment, are completely irrelevant. Those items are refering to citizenship and NOT the Natural Born Citizen clause of the US Constitution.

~~~~~

 

5th item – Go dig up your OWN Birth certificate. Look at it. Who was it issued by? It is issued by either the STATE in which you were born, or maybe the ‘County’ within the STATE that you were born. We are not citizens of the USA, we are citizens of a Sovereign State, that is a PART of the United States of America.

Senator Ted Cruz can not be eligible as a natural born citizen because he was not born in any of the sovereign states that make up the USA. He is considered a US Citizen, due to his mothers citizenship but he does not meet the requirement of being a natural born citizen. Plus his father was a Cuban Citizen at the time of his birth. As we’ve established above, citizenship follows the Father. As does a last name. Only in the Liberal world of misfits here in the USA can a child take a mothers last name or a hyphenated name — Those dang Wacko Birds!

 

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

 

 

~~~~~

 

6th item – Here is a link to every president and what made them eligible or not.

 

 

~~~~~

Misc. Links

 

http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/jyinger/citizenship/history.htm

 

 
http://www.redstate.com/2012/05/21/on-this-natural-born-citizen-issue-part-i-from-alexander-hamilton-to-lynch-v-clarke/

     

 

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Twenty Fifth Day of March in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fifteen.


 

yeoldschoolhouse1

 

 

My previous post was focused on Virginia’s Schools and then this morning, I stumbled across THIS GEM  from our own back yards — NC Department of Public Instruction headed up by none other than June Atkinson of the Democratic Party! She is SOoooo proud of these numbers! They are showing ‘Improvements’ over the last few years. You however, should be APPALLED!

 

JuneAtkinson

Here’s the Full Report — 164 pages in a nice PDF file. I spent about 1.5 hours this morning going over it. Read it they said. It’ll be FUN they said! Nope!

Below is just a FEW of the graphs & charts I pulled out of the report. I’ll let YOU decide what sort of trends you notice.

 

Are you happy with these numbers? Click to enlarge the image.

Are you happy with these numbers? Click to enlarge the image.

 

 

Let’s START with the 32 schools, then move to the 26, then the 40, etc. etc. It’s TIME to use some RID-X and pump these Septic Tanks Clean before they spread MORE Disease & Mayhem.

Click to enlarge the image.

Click to enlarge the image.

 

Click to enlarge any of the images.

NCSchoolCrime2015Reportpg37RacialSuspensions NCSchoolCrime2015Reportpg44RacialSuspensionsLongTerm NCSchoolCrime2015Reportpg70DurhamSuspensionsLongVsShortTerm

I’ll  urge you contact your local Board of Education. Here’s the Contact Info for Durham’s Board.

Click to enlarge the image.

Click to enlarge the image.

 

Daily Haymaker also has a good write-up on this issue.

 

 

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Eighteenth Day of March in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fifteen.

It is also SD2010’s 5th birthday. This site was born on March 18th, 2010 Anno Domini.


Update March 20, 2015 @ 8:00am - The parents were on Fox & Friends on Thursday morning.

 

 

 

 

 

UPDATE: March 17, 2015 @ 10:ooam - It has been brought to my attention that the Orange County School board has issued a statement.

 

            

 

Page 1 - Click to enlarge

Page 1 – Click to enlarge

 

 

Page 2 - Click to enlarge

Page 2 – Click to enlarge


SilenceDogood2010 OP ED #2 — I have noticed that the comments supporting this atrocity are few and far between. And just this morning, I’ve had another commenter that claims her child attends this school. Yet the IP Address, from where the comment was made, is out of Georgia. That’s gotta be one hellava of a bus ride to & from school.

I have also been asked to edit and change contents of this post. Respectfully I refuse to do so. This issue came to light a few days ago & as facts present themselves, I shall make amendments to keep my readers informed. I will NOT Re-write History(even though it’s recent History) to appease a handful of whiners.

A wise man once said —- It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” ~ Mark Twain

These folks have been fooled into believing that their actions have no consequences. They do. If your name is anywhere on that program, you own part of it. In criminal terms, you are an “Accessory Before the fact“. 

 

 

Accessory Before The Fact –
Definition– A person who aids, abets, or encourages another to commit a crime but who is not present at the scene. An accessory before the fact, like an accomplice, may be held criminally liable to the same extent as the principal. Many jurisdictions refer to an accessory before the fact as an accomplice.

 

UPDATE: March 16, 2015 @ 9:ooam —– From one of the comments below it seems that a better number to use is 540-672-4550. It has also been brought to my attention that Ms. Scott, the music teacher, wasn’t involved in the organizing of this program.

It has also been brought to my attention that this event took place either last Thursday or Friday (12th or 13th of March). It had been postponed due to local weather issues.

      

Allow me to address this issue of Ms. Scott, the music teacher:

 

 

SilenceDogood2010’s OP EDThe comments  give the impression that Ms. Scott is innocent and should NOT be held accountable for this program. I disagree. Ms. Scott was asked to provide music for this nightmare. Ms. Scott SHOULD be a responsible adult and inquired about the program & its contents. Instead, she appears to have followed her commanders and marched ‘Goose-Step’ in line with the others. This is what is WRONG in our society today. No one takes responsibility for their involvement in the crime.

As  they say, hindsight is 20-20, but Ms. Scott  should have looked at the program before just ‘Going with the flow’ and providing the ‘Motown Sound’.

However, since this a developing story, I have chosen to REMOVE Ms. Scott’s Phone & email address from this posting.

          

~~~ End of Updates ~~~

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited Screengrab from David Webb's Facebook page. Click to enlarge

Edited Screengrab from David Webb’s Facebook page. Click to enlarge

 

 

 

 

I stumbled across this group of photos on Facebook. It was 1st posted, or shared by Holly — of Hobby Lobby Fame — and then, as I was vetting the story further, I saw that David Webb had also reported on it. I’m not sure exactly WHEN this program took place but I am guessing sometime in late February.

Here’s the actual text posted to the Facebook photos;

 

 

READ IT ALL… In our schools?

This story is sickening from a Police Officer’s perspective. If you’re a Police Officer supporter, this should make you want to throw up.

Notice the words in the first picture of the young lady’s hair. (“I can’t breathe, Stop shooting, etc.)

Of course this is our opinion. Numbers will be provide for you to either “applaud” the school’s efforts or for you to voice your concerns.

Sent in by a supporter/ Deputy who at this time wishes to remain anonymous.

————-

In his own words:

Hello, my name is XXXXX XXXXXXX.
I am looking for your help to get this story out there.

Last night my 8 year old daughter attended Orange County Schools annual Black History Month event (Orange County Virginia). We had assumed the program would highlight all the great accomplishments of people like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Or Rosa Parks. Instead, as my wife, 5 year old son and daughter found out, it was very little about them.

As my wife walked into the auditorium, she noticed the students working the event were wearing black t-shirts that stated “I Can’t Breath” and “‪#‎blacklivesmatter‬”. My wife tried to overlook it and settled in to enjoy the program. My daughter had been selected to participate in the program and sing a “Motown Medley” as part of one of the elementary choirs. My wife looked at the program that she was handed as she took her seat and found disturbing and, what I would argue, anti-police propaganda all over it.

At this point my wife had an uneasy feeling about what this program was actually about and quickly realized those black t-shirts were not just some of the students “protesting” but that it was part of the nights theme! One by one students began reciting “last words”. To include

“I’m from Ferguson Missouri…. I was told to put my hands up. I did, and I was shot 7 times. My name is Michael Brown.”

“I was sitting on the couch and the police came in my house and shot me in the head. I was seven years old”.

” I was falsely harassed for selling cigarettes and I was put into a choke hold that eventually lead to my death. I can’t breath my name is Eric Garner”

My wife was shocked and, at first, unable to move. She quickly grabbed her phone and recorded the last two students talking. Our daughter went up on stage as she debated removing her from the program knowing it would break her heart because she had practiced so hard for this and was so excited to perform.

She contacted me and told me what was going on. I told her as soon as xxxxx was done to leave. My wife did so and went to the staff member in charge of the students, with several other parents also unhappy about the program, and asked for our daughter. She was initially told they would not release her until intermission. My wife pressed a little harder and they released the students.

The program list readings that we’re going to be done the second half of the program. The titles included

“Voices: The Exhausting Task of Being Black in America”

“Don’t Shoot”

“Not an Elegy for Mike Brown”

“I Can’t Breathe”

“Does my Black Life Matter”

“They Don’t Really Care About Us”

We are upset about this for many reasons. We were excited to allow our daughter to participate in a Black History event. But why were we not told our daughter would be participating in a political event. Or I’d go as far as saying a protest based off of anti-police sentiment. Why would the school allow this type of rhetoric and, according to Eric Holder, lies. How dare they expose my young children to this type of propaganda.

The worst part about this entire event, was the conversation we had to have with our 8 year old girl well into the night about all of this, why they were saying this and why it was a lie. Things we shouldn’t have had to discuss in the detail we did.

I work very hard to serve my community. I don’t make a lot of money and I don’t ask for recognition for doing my job. But to hear my baby girl ask us why do cops shoot good people? Are they bad cops? Does that make you (me) bad?? It was heart breaking and infuriating all at the same time.

I have contacted the School Board and Lightfoot Elementary Principle. So far I have only heard back from my daughters principle.

Superintendent – Dr. Tanner
540-661-4550

Director of Student Services -
Mr. Jean Kotolka 540-661-4550

Director of Elementary Instruction -
Mr. Bill Berry 540-661-4550

Lightfoot Elementary School Principle – Ms. Williams 540-661-4520

Music Teacher – Ms. Scott
XXX-XXX-XXXX

Emails:

Dr. Tanner — btanner@ocss-va.org
Mr. Kotulka — ekotulka@ocss-va.org
Mr. Berry — bberry@ocss-va.org
Ms. Williams — jwilliams@ocss-va.org
Ms. Scott — XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Any help you can give me to tell our story would be greatly appreciated. I feel this is an outrage to the LEO community and the general public.

 

 

 

Here are the photos. Click on any image to enlarge it.

 

 

 

VirginiaSchool02VirginiaSchool01 VirginiaSchool03 VirginiaSchool04 VirginiaSchool05

         

Is this what you want taught to your kids in the public schools that YOU pay for?

 

 

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Fifteenth Day of March in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fifteen. Beware the Ides of March. 


An African Tribal Village

An African Tribal Village

 

 

 

As I was reading some of our local news yesterday, I ran across this comment on a Durham Herald Sun news story. To me, it appeared as though it was a copy/paste style comment. A little search and Wah-Laa… I had found the actual author.

 

Ten Percent Is Not Enough

By Anthony Bryan – September 23, 2014

For almost 150 years the United States has been conducting an interesting experiment. The subjects of the experiment: black people and working-class whites.

The hypothesis to be tested: Can a people taken from the jungles of Africa and forced into slavery be fully integrated as citizens in a majority white population?

The whites were descendants of Europeans who had created a majestic civilization. The former slaves had been tribal peoples with no written language and virtually no intellectual achievements. Acting on a policy that was not fair to either group, the government released newly freed black people into a white society that saw them as inferiors. America has struggled with racial discord ever since.

Decade after decade the problems persisted but the experimenters never gave up. They insisted that if they could find the right formula the experiment would work, and concocted program after program to get the result they wanted. They created the Freedman’s Bureau, passed civil rights laws, tried to build the Great Society, declared War on Poverty, ordered race preferences, built housing projects, and tried midnight basketball.

Their new laws intruded into people’s lives in ways that would have been otherwise unthinkable. They called in National Guard troops to enforce school integration. They outlawed freedom of association. Over the protests of parents, they put white children on buses and sent them to black schools and vice versa. They tried with money, special programs, relaxed standards, and endless handwringing to close the “achievement gap.” To keep white backlash in check they began punishing public and even private statements on race. They hung up Orwellian public banners that commanded whites to “Celebrate Diversity!” and “Say No to Racism.” Nothing was off limits if it might salvage the experiment.

Some thought that what W.E.B. DuBois called the Talented Tenth would lead the way for black people. A group of elite, educated blacks would knock down doors of opportunity and show the world what blacks were capable of. There is a Talented Tenth. They are the black Americans who have become entrepreneurs, lawyers, doctors and scientists. But ten percent is not enough. For the experiment to work, the ten percent has to be followed by a critical mass of people who can hold middle-class jobs and promote social stability. That is what is missing.

Through the years, too many black people continue to show an inability to function and prosper in a culture unsuited to them. Detroit is bankrupt, the south side of Chicago is a war zone, and the vast majority of black cities all over America are beset by degeneracy and violence. And blacks never take responsibility for their failures. Instead, they lash out in anger and resentment.

Across the generations and across the country, as we have seen in Detroit, Watts, Newark, Los Angeles, Cincinnati, and now Ferguson, rioting and looting are just one racial incident away. The white elite would tell us that this doesn’t mean the experiment has failed. We just have to try harder. We need more money, more time, more understanding, more programs, and more opportunities.

But nothing changes no matter how much money is spent, no matter how many laws are passed, no matter how many black geniuses are portrayed on TV, and no matter who is president. Some argue it’s a problem of “culture,” as if culture creates people’s behavior instead of the other way around. Others blame “white privilege.”

But since 1965, when the elites opened America’s doors to the Third World, immigrants from Asia and India–people who are not white, not rich, and not “connected”–have quietly succeeded. While the children of these people are winning spelling bees and getting top scores on the SAT, black “youths” are committing half the country’s violent crime–crime, which includes viciously punching random white people on the street for the thrill of it that has nothing to do with poverty.

The experiment has failed. Not because of culture, or white privilege, or racism. The fundamental problem is that white people and black people are different. They differ intellectually and temperamentally. These differences result in permanent social incompatibility.

Our rulers don’t seem to understand just how tired their white subjects are with this experiment. They don’t understand that white people aren’t out to get black people; they are just exhausted with them. They are exhausted by the social pathologies, the violence, the endless complaints, and the blind racial solidarity, the bottomless pit of grievances, the excuses, and the reflexive animosity.

The elites explain everything with “racism,” and refuse to believe that white frustration could soon reach the boiling point.

 

 

London circa 1870

London circa 1870

 

 

Scotland circa 1870

Scotland circa 1870

 

 

 

Italy circa 1870

Italy circa 1870

 

 

Matsuyama Castle in Japan. This one was built between 1820 - 1854

Matsuyama Castle in Japan. This one was built between 1820 – 1854

 

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Twelfth Day of March in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fifteen.


 

 

 

GOP_LOGO

 

                      

Resolution to close Republican primaries in North Carolina.

 

 

Whereas, the current North Carolina practice of holding open primaries, could allow non-Republicans to pick the North Carolina GOP candidates for the general election.

Whereas, the North Carolina GOP can close the primaries as per ;§ 163 119. Voting by unaffiliated voter in party primary. If a political party has, by action of its State Executive Committee reported to the State Board of Elections by resolution delivered no later than the first day of December preceding a primary, provided that unaffiliated voters may vote in the primary of that party, an unaffiliated voter may vote in the primary of that party by announcing that intention under G.S. 163 166.7(a). For a party to withdraw its permission, it must do so by action of its State Executive Committee, similarly reported to the State Board of Elections no later than the first day of December preceding the primary where the withdrawal is to become effective. (1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 762, s. 7; 2002 159, s. 21(a).)

Whereas, Republicans are most likely to pick the candidates that most closely adhere to and advance the platform of the NC GOP.

Whereas, the significant number of Republicans who have recently left the GOP may well be encouraged to re-register as Republicans if that were the only way they could influence the party slate.

Whereas, open primaries make it possible for non-Republicans to skew the primary vote so that the candidate that most reflects the values of the Republican Party does not receive enough votes to avoid an expensive run-off election.

Whereas, hijinks such as Sen. Thad Cochran’s controversial tactic of recruiting Democrats to secure his nomination in Mississippi’s most recent Republican primary result in a lack of trust in the electoral process by the voting public.

Whereas, trust in the party is essential if our GOP candidates are to win elections.

Therefore be it resolved that the NC State GOP close its primaries and allow only registered Republicans to vote in them and that this resolution shall become effective upon adoption.

 

 

Written by Fremont V Brown III

          

         

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Tenth Day of March in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fifteen.


Tony Robinson 2014 Mug Shot. He's Bi-Racial but don't let that get in the way of a good MSM RACISM-FEST!

Tony Robinson 2014 Mug Shot. He’s Bi-Racial but don’t let that get in the way of a good MSM RACISM-FEST!

 

 

 

Race as in Racial Conflict — That seems to be the Main Stream Media’s primary agenda nowadays. This past weekend, we had the 50th Anniversary of the Selma March… Also called Bloody Sunday. All the major news outlets covered it. The odd thing is, that none of them reported the fact that Bloody Sunday was an attack on Civil Rights Marchers  by DEMOCRATS! Do some studying on Sheriff Jim Clark of Dallas County, Alabama. He was the ringleader of the democrat thugs on that day in history.

The NY Times on Sunday featured a cropped photo of the anniversary event on their front page. It cropped out ‘Dubya & Laura Bush’ and only showed BHO leading the event march.

 

 

 

Robinson's Grandmother. Click to enlarge.

Robinson’s Grandmother. Click to enlarge.

Soooo, I logged into the network  this afternoon and Lo & Behold, the YAHOO Home Page had a BIG STORY out of Wisconsin. TOP BILLING!!! Seems a Black 19 year old (Bi-Racial actually) was shot & killed by a White Police Officer on Friday. This posting is going to focus on that aspect of RACE and the MSM. It appears that Madison Wisconsin may become a powder keg similar to Ferguson Missouri.

 

Screengrab of the YAHOO / AP Story Headline. Click to enlarge.

Screengrab of the YAHOO / AP Story Headline. Click to enlarge.

 

 

http://news.yahoo.com/wisconsin-chief-treading-carefully-fatal-shooting-203544916.html

 

 

I’m not going to waste space here by showing any of this AP / YAHOO nonsense… It’s all your typical liberal non-journalism crap. It’s all “UNARMED Black Teen, great kid, heading to Community College blah blah blah”. Feel free to read the link yourself.

Then we have a UBER-LIBERAL Milwaukee  Journal Sentinel newspaper, who I must add, did a much more thorough story. Below are a few excerpts.

Madison — Before Tony T. Robinson was a shot by a police officer inside a house on Friday, events that night were quickly spiraling out of control for the teen.

Madison police were called when he started jumping in front of cars on Williamson St., on the city’s east side, according to a police radio scanner. Then in swift succession, Robinson apparently hit a friend and tried strangling someone else.

Robinson, 19, who was black and unarmed, was killed by an officer who was called to the incident, which apparently started at a gas station and ended with Robinson’s death in a two-story house across the street.

Robinson had been convicted for his role in a felony armed robbery last April.

Then there’s this tidbit a little further down in the story…

In a Dane County dispatch recording, which was posted online by a website called Liberty News, the dispatcher says witnesses reported that no weapons had been seen. A few seconds later, the dispatcher says Robinson entered a residence at 1125 Williamson St. and tried to strangle someone.

The dispatcher says the person being strangled was a “patron,” apparently a customer from the gas station across the street.

About 20 seconds after Kenny entered the residence, he can be heard breathing loudly and saying, “shots fired.” Seven seconds later, Kenny yells, “shots fired, start an ambulance — at least one.”

The shooting occurred about 6:30 p.m. Friday. Robinson died at a hospital.

“There’s no doubt that we have to be clear about this: He was unarmed,” Madison Police Chief Mike Koval told reporters on Saturday. “That’s going to make this all the more complicated for the investigators, for the public to accept.”

The state Department of Justice’s Division of Criminal Investigation will conduct an independent review of the shooting, as required by state law.

Kenny, 45, was injured Friday night during the altercation with Robinson, but his injuries weren’t significant and he wasn’t hospitalized, Madison police spokesman Joel DeSpain said. As a matter of protocol, a blood sample was taken from the officer.

This is the second time that Kenny has killed someone in the line of duty. On July 15, 2007, he shot and killed Ronald Brandon, 48, who was white, after Brandon pointed what turned out to be a pellet gun at Kenny. The officer did not know the weapon was a pellet gun, and the district attorney cleared Kenny.

After serving nine years in the U.S. Coast Guard, Kenny started working at the Madison Police Department in 2002. He is a member of the department’s mounted patrol and has worked with the special weapons and tactics team.

 

Then a little further down the story gives this info. How does one get arrested in April, and also convicted AND SENTENCED in April? Does a Guilty Plea eliminate the trial altogether. And if so, why wasn’t Robinson serving time for Felony Armed Robbery?

 

 

 2014 armed robbery

DeSpain confirmed Sunday that Robinson was arrested April 25 with three other people in connection with an armed home invasion at a Madison apartment.

According to a department incident report, Robinson, then 18, was arrested with the two other men and one woman shortly before 6 a.m. as they were fleeing an apartment with electronics, a shotgun and other property. Police were called when a witness saw several men, one armed with a long gun, enter the building.

No injuries were reported in the case, police said. Robinson pleaded guilty to felony armed robbery and received three years of probation, according to court records.

 

At this juncture, I want us to focus on Wisconsin Law and Armed Robbery.

943.32  Robbery.
(1) Whoever, with intent to steal, takes property from the person or presence of the owner by either of the following means is guilty of a Class E felony:
(a) By using force against the person of the owner with intent thereby to overcome his or her physical resistance or physical power of resistance to the taking or carrying away of the property; or
(b) By threatening the imminent use of force against the person of the owner or of another who is present with intent thereby to compel the owner to acquiesce in the taking or carrying away of the property.
(2) Whoever violates sub. (1) by use or threat of use of a dangerous weapon, a device or container described under s. 941.26 (4) (a) or any article used or fashioned in a manner to lead the victim reasonably to believe that it is a dangerous weapon or such a device or container is guilty of a Class C felony.
(3) In this section “owner” means a person in possession of property whether the person’s possession is lawful or unlawful.

From a Wisconsin Law Firm

“Armed Robbery Charges and Penalties — In the state of Wisconsin, armed robbery is classified as a Class C felony. The severity of the charge will depend largely on the circumstances of the case, such as whether the gun was drawn or fired. The possible penalties for an armed robbery conviction include: Up to 25 years in prison – Up to $100,000 in fines – Revocation of right to bear arms – Restitution”

So, we have now determined that Armed Robbery is a Class C Felony in Wisconsin, now let’s review the penalty. Please note the following is from this 95 page PDF file.

Page 7 of the PDF File

“Introduction – In Wisconsin, a felony is defined as any criminal offense that is punishable by imprisonment in state prison. All other criminal offenses are classified as misdemeanors. Any person age 17 years and older who commits a felony or misdemeanor is considered an adult and may be sentenced to confinement or placed on probation, and/or fined.”

Page 9 of the PDF File

Under 1997 Act 283, a bifurcated (determinate) sentencing structure was created for all felony offenses. Under this structure, courts are required to impose a bifurcated (two-part) sentence for any felony occurring on or after December 31, 1999, except for felonies resulting in a life sentence.

Page 13 of the PDF File

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge.

 

SilenceDogood2010 Comments: If Tony Robinson was convicted in April of 2014, for Armed Robbery, why wasn’t he in jail? Why was he only given Probation? Had he been in jail, he wouldn’t be dead now. I think I can answer my own questions.

Because of Liberal Judges on the bench.

I tried to find out the judge’s name that sentenced Robinson, but I didn’t have any luck on that.

 

 

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Ninth Day of March in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fifteen.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 62 other followers