Representative Paul Luebke passed away on Saturday, October 29, 2016. My sincere condolences & prayers go out to his family.

Now, this leaves a vacancy in Durham’s Representation in the North Carolina General Assembly. According to our General Statutes, the Durham County Democratic Party can make a recommendation to the Governor to appoint a replacement for the remaining term that Luebke was elected to. That terms ends on January 1, 2017. See NCGS § 163-11.

Now, we are encountering an UNUSUAL situation here; We are 8 days away from the General Election. The ballots have been printed and we’ve already started ‘Early Voting’, so I’m sure there are many that have already cast a ballot for Mr. Luebke. After all, he was the heavy favorite in ‘The Democrat controlled Utopia of Durham’.

Here’s the dilemma:  As of his DEATH on Saturday, Mr. Luebke is no longer eligible to run for the NC House.

NC State Constitution, Article II – Section 7

Sec. 7.  Qualifications for Representative.


Each Representative, at the time of his election, shall be a qualified voter of the State, and shall have resided in the district for which he is chosen for one year immediately preceding his election.



Since Mr. Luebke is disqualified from THIS Particular Election, the other candidate on the ballot, Elissa Fuchs, will be the ONLY QUALIFIED Candidate to receive votes. She SHOULD BE declared the winner of this particular race. However, from my early chats with our officials, it appears the democrats will pick his replacement. And our GOP will stand by & allow it.


I personally have scoured through the majority of Chapter 163 of our elections statutes and I can NOT find anything to address this particular situation. Now, there are statutes on ‘Deaths Before & After a Primary Election’, and as stated above, filling a vacancy  while in office, but nothing on how to handle a candidates death, this close to a General Election. If I’ve missed the statute in Chapter 163, you legal scholars please correct me & point me to it.

Now, for a full disclaimer, I’m NOT a fan of Mr. Luebke. He was a socialist. I’ve questioned for years whether or not he even resided within the district that he represents. His other job is a ‘Professor of Sociology’ at UNC-G in Greensboro NC. That’s a heck of a commute on a daily basis … 60 plus miles one way. And he UNLAWFULLY uses his NC Legislative Email account for correspondence with his students & other faculty there at UNC-G. Listed on his UNC-G Profile.


Screengrab from the UNC-G faculty page. Notice the ncleg.net email address

On his NC Legislative page, he lists his address as a P.O. Box. Upon further investigation, this SAME P.O. Box is assigned to a company named Denson Printing here in Durham. Did Luebke RESIDE at Denson Printing or maybe just got his mail there?   Who knows?



If we look up Mr. Luebke on the State Voter database, he lists an address of 311 S. LaSalle St. This is the address of Duke Manor Apartments. Over the last 20 plus years, Duke Manor has been a haven for thugs & illegals. I just can’t imagine a NC Representative actually living in a place like this. I’ve got a sneaky suspicion that this was a ‘Phantom Address’ to allow him to file for election.


Board of Elections Filing Data


A simple Google Search will turn up THOUSANDS of hits for ‘Duke Manor Crime’ over the last several years.


I hope and pray that our GOP leaders won’t cave in, as usual, & allow the Democrats keep control of this seat in the NC General Assembly. The legal team needs to RE-READ the actual LAWS and not just ‘Go With The FLOW’ like they have done in the past.


And, if the legal team wants to investigate our Durham State Senator, Mike Woodard, I did a write-up on him years past. He TOO uses a non-residential address.



Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Thirty First Day of October in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen.


Today, I’m going offer a simple solution to our healthcare cost problem.



Eliminate Federal Regulations altogether. Insurance regs; EPA regs; Building regs; Medical regs; FDA regs —  The Works! All of them.


If we look back — Just 60 years ago — People paid for their own healthcare. The cost of having a baby was a few hundred dollars. NOT 10’s of thousands;

“The costs of childbirth can be steep. The charge for an uncomplicated cesarean section was about $15,800 in 2008. An uncomplicated vaginal birth cost about $9,600, government data show.” ~ from WebMD


1960: Grand Total for baby delivery = $230.05


Federal regulations have driven the cost of medical care THROUGH THE ROOF over the last 40+ years. The facilities needs special wiring; The anesthesiologist needs unique licensing & ‘Continuing Education’ to maintain said license; The doctors must also have a license & MANDATORY malpractice insurance — Special certifications too if they are in some specialty field.  The Pharma companies have to spend millions of dollars, & jump thru all sorts of FDA hoops, just to get a drug to clinical trials — Not to mention to market. And regulations on them during the R&D phase — Inspections, Qualifications, Certifications, equipment calibrations, and whatnot.


Hospitals must have “Certified Radiation Techs” on staff & all employees that work anywhere NEAR a machine that uses x-rays, or radioactive reagents, MUST have Special Training, & Certification, & RE-CERTIFICATION every year or 2. This includes janitorial staff.


Special little containers must be purchased & marked as “BIOHAZARD” for a piece of bloody gauze, or a syringe. And then there is special handling of these containers once they are full.  $4 for a small sharps container that should be less than $0.75 each.





All these items add to the total cost of your healthcare.



And I won’t even begin to harp on the administration costs of ‘Regulations’. I’ll just let this ONE LITTLE Chart make my point.



“Over the 58-year period, government spending on economic regulatory programs has grown 11-fold, but that is a much slower rate than the growth in social regulatory programs, which are now 25 times what they were in 1960. Personnel in economic regulatory agencies is 2.5 times greater than in 1960, while staffing at social regulatory agencies is six times larger. By 2009, only 15% of the regulators’ budget focused on economic regulation.”


Source: http://www.forbes.com/sites/susandudley/2016/05/17/regulatory-spending-from-eisenhower-to-obama/#23d373d5c7e4



Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Thirtieth Day of October in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen. 



A worker carries a sign that will be displayed at a polling place that will inform voters of the new voter ID law that goes into effect in 2016 at the Mecklenburg County Board of Elections warehouse in Charlotte

2016 at the Mecklenburg County Board of Elections warehouse in Charlotte, North Carolina November 3, 2014. REUTERS/Chris Keane (UNITED STATES – Tags: POLITICS)




This is an ALERT for every single, solitary,
Patriot out there. We MUST DEMAND honest elections from our elected public servants.


Last week, we got the news of a shooting at a Washington State mall. The MSM reported the shooter as being hispanic. That was incorrect information. He was actually a Turkish Muslim Immigrant. He’s 20 years old, and he has already VOTED 3 times in the state of Washington.

Immigrants aren’t allowed to VOTE. Immigrants aren’t allowed to own firearms, except under special conditions.








His info from the Washington Secretary of State’s database








His Voter History via the Sec. of State database.



USNews reports that he is NOT a Citizen.

I am requesting ONCE AGAIN, that my fellow North Carolinians get on the horn and urge Governor Pat McCrory to issue the Executive Order to reinstate Session Law 2013-381.



We cannot allow this voter fraud to continue any longer. We have Illegal Aliens, who were issued DACA Drivers Licenses on our voter rolls. We have Sanctuary cities like Durham, Chapel Hill, & Asheville allowing non-citizens to do voter registration drives and all sorts of other shenanigans.



We have recently had the 4th Circuit CoA issue an opinion on our voter ID law that they have no authority to opine on.





Time is of the Essence.





Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Twenty Eighth Day of September in the year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen.



North Carolina’s Voter ID Law has some MORE support that I, SilenceDogood2010, have stumbled across.




Most recently, it was brought to my attention that in August of 2016, those nutty & wacky court justices of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals printed the following in one of their opinions;




9th Circuit opinion, August 2016





Now, upon further research, I find that the US Supreme Court issued basically the same statement in 2013.






February 2013, supreme Court opinion.






That statement IS:



“Federal courts are courts of limited subject-matter jurisdiction, possessing only that power authorized by the Constitution and by Congress.”  




OK legal scholars, please tell me again how the lower district courts, and the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, has jurisdiction over a case involving the State of North Carolina & its Voter ID Legislation? What about over ‘Election Districts’ & how they were drawn? And lastly, let us revisit N.C.’s Amendment 1, Same Sex Marriage — A Constitutional Amendment passed by the voters of the State of N.C. . . . How does a Federal District Court have any say in how a State modifies its ‘Constitution’? Or the authority to overrule it?






Misc. Links.


Gunn Vs Minton – A SCOTUS Opinion





Election Disputes – 28 USC 1344 – This states what the federal district courts have control over . . . aka jurisdiction concerning election issues.








Full list of district courts jurisdiction — the Federal Code 28 USC, Chapter 85.



Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Sixteenth day of September in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen.



A worker carries a sign that will be displayed at a polling place that will inform voters of the new voter ID law that goes into effect in 2016 at the Mecklenburg County Board of Elections warehouse in Charlotte

2016 at the Mecklenburg County Board of Elections warehouse in Charlotte, North Carolina November 3, 2014. REUTERS/Chris Keane (UNITED STATES – Tags: POLITICS)



The following is a list of the the folks who have sued the State of North Carolina over our Voter ID legislation. Their names came directly from the US 4th Circuit Court opinion.

I have taken the liberty to STUDY these folks & their voting habits. I think you’ll find the following data very interesting. I know I did.


This plaintiff appears to only vote in MAJOR Elections. They have not cast any ballots, in any local, nor municipal elections in recent years. Even if you do not live within some City Limits, we still have local elections for county commissioners, & sheriffs. Granted, these elections MAY be held during the federal elections. That varies county by county I do believe.


BECKY HURLEY MOCK – BURLINGTON, NC 27217 (last Municipal Vote was 2005)




The following plaintiffs have some sporadic voting habits. You will notice they didn’t bother to participate in our 2nd 2016 Primary. Our 2nd NC Primary was basically for our NC Supreme Court Justices. Some areas had Congressional Races too.  One would think that if you were SO CONCERNED about voting & elections, you would SURELY participate in electing State Supreme Court Justices.



Election  / Voted Method / Voted County / Voted Party

11/04/2014 GENERAL / IN-PERSON / DURHAM            


11/05/2013 MUNICIPAL / IN-PERSON / DURHAM            




ASGOD BARRANTES – CHARLOTTE, NC 28210 (doesn’t do Municipal Voting either)

Election / Voted Method / Voted County / Voted Party

11/04/2014 GENERAL / IN-PERSON / MECKLENBURG              


11/06/2012 GENERAL / ABS-1STOP / MECKLENBURG              





Election / Voted Method / Voted County  / Voted Party

11/03/2015 MUNICIPAL / IN-PERSON / DURHAM           


11/04/2014 GENERAL / ABS-1STOP / HARNETT          




Election / Voted Method / Voted County / Voted Party

10/06/2015 MUNICIPAL /  IN-PERSON / WAKE  

11/04/2014 GENERAL / ABS-1STOP / WAKE  


10/08/2013 MUNICIPAL / ABS-1STOP / WAKE  

11/06/2012 GENERAL / ABS-1STOP / MECKLENBURG              






And this little plaintiff only became registered in May of this year – 2016. And she DID NOT cast a ballot in our 2nd primary.  She has NEVER cast a ballot in NC — According to our Board of Elections database.

I have to assume that the liberal lawyers found out she wasn’t registered to vote — how would that look for a plaintiff to NOT BE A VOTER, on a Voter ID lawsuit? I guess they made her go register.







I have removed the actual addresses of these folks simply out of courtesy. This information was all gathered off of public databases & documents. No Privacy Violations were committed.  The entire purpose of this posting, is to educate the PUBLIC on WHO is causing the state problems and to provide some background on their behavior & voting trends. Less than 25 people TOTAL have signed their names to this Frivolous Lawsuit against the State of NC. They have caused chaos & mayhem for over 6 million registered NC voters.


Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Tenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen.






A worker carries a sign that will be displayed at a polling place that will inform voters of the new voter ID law that goes into effect in 2016 at the Mecklenburg County Board of Elections warehouse in Charlotte

2016 at the Mecklenburg County Board of Elections warehouse in Charlotte, North Carolina November 3, 2014. REUTERS/Chris Keane (UNITED STATES – Tags: POLITICS)





My buddy Bart sent me his thoughts on this battle between North Carolina & the ‘Federales’. It is fairly simple too.



Here’s how it would work…



Governor Pat McCrory issues an Executive Order directing the NC State Board of Elections to proceed with SL2013-381 as written. Bart even wrote up a Sample template for the governor to go by:




Proposed Executive Order


From the Office of the Governor of the Great State of North Carolina – For Immediate Release


WHEREAS, the U.S. Constitution plainly states that the federal judiciary has certain limitations on what it can, and can not do. Article III, Section 2, Clause 2 states that any case in which a ‘State’, or any of its ‘Public Ministers’ is a party, the Supreme Court shall have ‘ORIGINAL JURISDICTION’.

“In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.”

WHEREAS, The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals has clearly overstepped their authority, henceforth the North Carolina State Board of Elections, and all related agencies, shall consider this opinion by the court, issued on July 29, 2016,  to be Null & Void.

WHEREAS, The North Carolina Constitution, Article III, Section 5, Clause 10 states;

“…the Governor may make such changes in the allocation of offices and agencies and in the allocation of those functions, powers, and duties as he considers necessary for efficient administration.  If those changes affect existing law, they shall be set forth in executive orders, …”

NOW, THEREFORE, by the power vested in me as Governor by the Constitution and laws of North Carolina, IT IS ORDERED:

The Great State of North Carolina will proceed with our November 2016 general elections according to the provisions and procedures defined in SESSION LAW 2013-381, aka “Voter Information Verification Act” that I signed into law on August 12, 2013.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto signed my name and affixed the Great Seal of the State of North Carolina at the Capitol in the City of Raleigh, this ___ day of _______ in the year of our Lord two thousand and sixteen, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty.




Now, folks will be screaming saying “YOU CAN’T DO THAT! You’re Violating Federal Court Rulings.” Actually, no he isn’t. You see, here in the U.S.A., our courts do NOT issue rulings. They issue what is called “An Opinion of the Court”. Kings make ‘Rulings’, judges do not.



As I have pointed  out in earlier blog posts, our US federal district & appeals courts, the 4th District in this case, they have no authority over any cases in which  a ‘STATE’ is a party. The supreme Court has ‘Original Jurisdiction’ over those  cases. It plainly says so in the US Constitution, Article III, Section 2, Clause 2:




In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.





Page 3 of the 4th Circuit’s opinion showing that indeed the “State of North Carolina” is a party in this case.


Now, has the supreme Court heard the arguments concerning this case? Have the lawyers for both parties presented their evidence directly to the supreme Court? No they haven’t!

Is the ‘STATE of NC’ a party in this law suit brought on by the liberal left? Yes, it IS!

Is Governor Patrick McCrory (who is a public Minister BTW) — is he ‘affected’ by this suit? Yes, he IS!


Has the supreme  Court recently made an opinion that stated Voter ID was acceptable? Yes they have. Just back in 2008.


Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, 553 U.S. 181 (2008), is a United States Supreme Court case holding that an Indiana law requiring voters to provide photo IDs did not violate the Constitution of the United States. ~ Wikipedia



So, we’ve established that lower districts & circuit appeals Courts have no authority & we’ve established that the governor has the power to direct his agencies for an ‘efficient administration’.


Lets put some ICING on this cake, shall we.

18 U.S.C., Chapter 29 § 595. Interference by administrative employees of Federal, State, or Territorial Governments

Whoever, being a person employed in any administrative position by the United States, or by any department or agency thereof, … uses his official authority for the purpose of interfering with, or affecting, the nomination or the election of any candidate for the office of President, Vice President, Presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representatives, Delegate from the District of Columbia, or Resident Commissioner, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.



Summary: The feds have made opinions by courts that do not have jurisdiction. The state of NC recognizes this fact and ignores the said opinions. And we’ve now been informed that the feds can’t interfere with this general election without breaking federal law.


Isn’t it great how ‘We the people’ still have the power of rational thought?



Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this First Day of September in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen.





On Monday, North Carolina’s Governor Pat McCrory asked the US supreme Court to issue a ‘STAY’ in the decision via the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals. There is one slight problem with this; The 4th Circuit CoA doesn’t have any jurisdiction over the case to begin with.



Allow me to explain.



Let us pull out our handy dandy Constitutions and do a little reading, shall we?



United States Constitution, Article III, Section 2, Clause 2 reads;



In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.




It is real simple, the lower federal courts, the district courts, & even the 4th Circuit have no authority to even hear these cases, much less make an opinion on them.



Is the State of North Carolina a ‘Party’ in these said cases?


Is NC’s Governor, a public Minister I might add, is he affected in these said cases?


Then how can a US district Court even be allowed to hear these cases?




These cases, the voting districts case, the voter ID case, our Amendment 1 case (Same Sex Marriage), and even the Transgender Bathroom bill, HB-2, ONLY the NC State Courts can make an opinion on them. And after exhausting those appeals, could they ONLY be taken up by the US supreme Court.



The liberal left, the NC NAACP, John Doe, & Jane Doe, (I don’t know HOW a court could accept plaintiffs with no real names, but that’s a different topic) have brought forth law suits against all of this different legislation. It went thru a couple of the State Courts and was upheld, but the left wasn’t satisfied, so they went to the FEDS.




Image of the 4th Circuit Opinion from July 29, 2016. Notice the plaintiffs “John Doe 1” & “Jane Doe 2”. What kind of court doc is that?




Our legal minds of today have not been taught the Rule of Law, they’ve been taught a bunch of mumbo jumbo — it’s like the movie “Idiocracy”.


Hopefully, this little portion of the interwebs, will get picked up and reviewed by some of our so-called legal scholars.




Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Seventeenth Day of August in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen.