Feeds:
Posts
Comments

DACABanner

UPDATE: Sunday October 19, 2014 at 8am – “Thank You” to the Carolina Plott Hound for picking up this story.

 

 

 

*** Urgent Breaking News ***

 

 

 

 

On Thursday, October 16, 2014, I was contacted concerning the fact that 10,000 +/- DACA individuals (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals)  were found on our North Carolina Voting rolls.

They are registered to Vote! These individuals are NOT Citizens of our country.

What Is DACA

On June 15, 2012, the Secretary of Homeland Security announced that certain people who came to the United States as children and meet several guidelines may request consideration of deferred action for a period of two years, subject to renewal. They are also eligible for work authorization. Deferred action is a use of prosecutorial discretion to defer removal action against an individual for a certain period of time. Deferred action does not provide lawful status.

 

 

Here’s how it works; The DACA people are allowed to be issued Drivers Licenses. They go thru the NC DMV process and are issued a Drivers License that states NO LAWFUL STATUS.

 

 

Sample of NC DACA Drivers License. Note the RED 'NO LAWFUL STATUS' displayed on the front of these.

Sample of NC DACA Drivers License. Note the RED ‘NO LAWFUL STATUS’ displayed on the front of these.

 

 

Now, every week or so, the NC DMV submits a list to the North Carolina State Board of Elections in Raleigh. The people on these lists have been issued a NCDL, but they are NOT Eligible to Vote. Well, according to the NC State BoE, they have to double check with our Federal Department of Homeland Security via the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS).

Here is where things get ‘SCREWY’ — According to Kim Strach, The Executive Director of the NC State BoE, there are  “an extremely large number” of people that the Feds say are Legal, yet they were not legal when they were issued DACA Drivers Licenses. One can NOT go from DACA Status this month, to Citizen Status next month. Or even in 4 or 5 months.

NC FIRE, North Carolinians For Immigration Reform and Enforcement, has been on top of this issue for a while now.

The following is a statement from James Johnson, President of NCFIRE;

I want to make something perfectly clear about the 10,000+ illegal alien voters on NC voter rolls. I am being questioned from all sides about the numbers I quoted. While there may not be exactly 10,000+ of the 14,836 illegals who have received a NC drivers license, I will stand by the fact that “an extremely large number of them are showing up on the NC voter rolls” because that is a direct quote from Kim Strach who is the Executive Director of the NC State Board of Elections.

I obtained the DACA license issue list (14,836 DACA licenses issued as of 9/20/14) from Sophia Spencer who is the Records Manager at the NC Department of Transportation.

Now, the person who is tasked with checking and removing the names from the NC voter rolls is Brian LiVecchi- special counsel to the NCSBOE.

During our initial conversation on Wed Oct 15th, we were discussing the DACA license issue list which is forwarded to his office every week by the NCDOT. I asked specifically about the 14,836 and how many were showing up on the voter rolls. He explained that the number was around 10,000+/-. On Fri. Oct 17th, he called me back saying he has been inundated with calls and wanted to “set the record straight” as to the 10,000 number he was referring to. That the numbers were nowhere near the 10,000 we were quoting. This was after the email we sent out statewide. His response was two-fold.

First, he explained the problem he was having is when they check the names (again) with DHS, the names were coming back as LEGAL. (Why they were being checked again is beyond me when they were already certified by the Federal Gov’t as illegal when they qualified for DACA status to obtain their NC drivers license). He continued, maybe they had been issued a green card, or had been granted permanent resident status, or became citizens, etc…. and simply didn’t inform the NCDMV and maybe that’s why they’re coming back from DHS as legal. (In any event, if the DACA names ARE coming back from DHS as being classified as LEGAL, then there is a big problem on the NATIONAL LEVEL in the states who opted to participate in the DACA license “program”. You can bet that they have DACA recipients on their voter rolls as well)

Well that makes no sense. Illegal aliens have to be “declared” DACA eligible by the Federal Gov’t if they want to obtain a NC drivers license. They complete the forms from the gov’t and take them to the NCDMV to obtain their license. There is NO question that they are illegal when they present the forms to the NCDMV and they are marked as such and issued a license that basically says so on it. They don’t have green cards, or haven’t been granted permanent resident status or any other classification other than illegal with deferred deportation status. If that’s the case, they would have weeded those out on a weekly basis so the list he is working on currently, wouldn’t be 10,000+/-. You don’t qualify as DACA one week and be granted a green card or permanent resident status the next. It simply doesn’t happen that way or that fast.

Second, he explained that he was having to go through every one of the registrations, one-at-a-time, that it takes several minutes to check each one and that there was no way to “batch check” them with the Federal Gov’t. He continued, having only one staff member, that we are having to pay an enormous amount of overtime to, he didn’t have enough staff to complete the job before the election much less before early voting begins on Oct 23rd.

Well, that was the intent of the email we sent out. It was to get him the help he needed to complete the checking process before the election in Nov.

And here is the second problem that we have with all of the explanations. If the numbers were no where near the figures we quoted, then why did Kim Strach, who is the Executive Director of the NCSBOE, say this in her response to Rep George Cleveland’s inquiry as to whether there was a problem with the DACA names on the voter rolls and why did Rep George Cleveland direct his assistant, Pamela Ahlin, to email it to every NC House member?

From here on down is the text of emails sent between NC Representative George Cleveland, Kim Strach of the NC SBoE, and James Johnson President of NCFIRE.

~~~ Begin Text of Email Correspondence ~~~

 

House Members:
Rep. Cleveland asked me to send this information to you since you were copied on the request for information on the Oct. 12 email from NCFIRE.
Pamela

Pamela Ahlin
Assistant to Rep. George Cleveland
919-715-6707
clevelandla@ncleg.net

NC General Assembly
Legislative Office Bldg.
300 N. Salisbury St. Suite 417A
Raleigh, NC 27603-5925

From: Strach, Kim [mailto:kimXXXXXXXXXXgov]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 9:03 PM
To: Rep. George Cleveland
Cc: Pamela Ahlin (Rep. George Cleveland)
Subject: Re: NC voter rolls and DACA licenses

Rep. Cleveland,
I have been addressing this issue since last year. We do conduct audits that look at DMV data to identify non-citizens. We then have to verify info through Homeland Security and the results we have been receiving show there is an extremely large number of voters that appear not to be citizens in the data we get from DMV but are citizens we when verify with Homeland Security. We’re working with DMV to identify the issues.

Let me know if you have questions or want to talk.

Thanks,
Kim

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

On Oct 13, 2014, at 9:14 PM, “Rep. George Cleveland” <George.Cleveland@ncleg.net> wrote:

Kim – is there a problem here?

George

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From: NCFIRE [mailto:NCFIRE@ncfire.info]
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2014 12:01 AM
To: don.wright@ncsbe.gov
Cc: Rep. Leo Daughtry; Rep. Julia Howard; Rep. Edgar Starnes; Rep. Mitchell Setzer; Rep. John M. Blust; Rep. Roger West; Rep. Linda Johnson; Rep. Paul Stam; Rep. Tim Moore; Rep. David Lewis; Rep. George Cleveland; Rep. J.H. Langdon; Rep. Nelson Dollar; Rep. Bryan Holloway; Rep. Pat Hurley; Rebecca Matthews (Rep. Ruth Samuelson); Rep. Thom Tillis (Speaker); Rep. Marilyn Avila; Rep. Hugh Blackwell; Rep. Jamie Boles, Jr; Rep. Justin Burr; Rep. Sarah Stevens; Rep. Frank Iler; Rep. John Faircloth; Rep. Craig Horn; Rep. John Torbett; Rep. Bill Brawley; Rep. Rayne Brown; Rep. Jeff Collins; Rep. Jimmy Dixon; Rep. Mike Hager; Rep. Kelly Hastings; Rep. Mark Hollo; Rep. Bert Jones; Rep. Jonathan Jordan; Rep. Tim Moffitt; Rep. Tom Murry; Rep. Phil Shepard; Rep. Michael Stone; Rep. Harry Warren; Rep. Dean Arp; Rep. John Bell; Rep. Robert Brawley; Rep. Mark Brody; Rep. Brian Brown; Rep. Rob Bryan; Rep. Dana Bumgardner; Rep. Rick Catlin; Rep. Debra Conrad; Rep. Ted Davis; Rep. Jeffrey Elmore; Rep. Jon Hardister; Rep. Charles Jeter; Rep. Donny Lambeth; Rep. Chris Malone; Rep. Susan Martin; Rep. Allen McNeill; Rep. Chris Millis; Rep. Larry Pittman; Rep. Michele Presnell; Rep. Nathan Ramsey; Rep. Dennis Riddell; Rep. Stephen Ross; Rep. Jason Saine; Rep. Jacqueline Schaffer; Rep. Michael Speciale; Rep. Bob Steinburg; Rep. John Szoka; Rep. Rena Turner; Rep. Andy Wells; Rep. Chris Whitmire; Rep. Carl Ford; House District 49’s Office; Rep. Nathan Baskerville; Rep. Josh Dobson; Rep. Roger Younts; Jay Delancy

Subject: Re: NC voter rolls and DACA licenses

Mr. Wright,

Since I haven’t received a reply from my first inquiry, I am re-sending my questions:

#1- When was the last time the voter rolls were cross checked with the names and addresses of DACA license recipients and,

#2- Do you plan to check the voter rolls for names and addresses of DACA license recipients before early voting begins on Oct 23rd?

James Johnson
President-NCFIRE
North Carolinians For Immigration Reform and Enforcement
http://www.NCFIRE.info
NCFIRE@ncfire.info
NCFIRE Hotline: 1-888-885-0879 (anonymous reporting)
cell # 910-286-3022

 

Associated Links:

Currently 45 states participate in the DACA Program.

http://www.nilc.org/dacadriverslicenses.html

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Eighteenth Day of October in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fourteen.


Hummm, this is ODD! North Carolina State Senator Mike Woodard lists 762 Ninth Street, Durham, NC 27705 as his personal address.

Other members of the NC General Assembly list either a P.O. Box or their actual home address.

One has to wonder, does Mike Woodard even live within the district that he represents?

Screengrab from the NCGA site October 13, 2014

Screengrab from the NCGA site October 13, 2014. Click to enlarge.

 

762 Ninth Street is the location of a business call “A-1 Mail Shoppe” [Building is currently being remodeled]

Google Street View  Image of 762 Ninth Street. Click to enlarge.

Google Street View Image of 762 Ninth Street. Click to enlarge.

 
http://www.loopnet.com/Listing/18779836/762-764-9th-St-Durham-NC/

 

    

    

    

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Fifteenth Day of October in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fourteen.


Sheriff Van Duncan

Sheriff Van Duncan

 

 

 

 

Get on the phones this morning and make calls to the Buncombe County Sheriff’s Office.

Sheriff Van Duncan – Buncombe County Sheriff’s Office
Phone: (828) 250-4503

Here’s your talking points / Script:    

 

 

I am calling today to DEMAND that Sheriff Duncan Charge & Arrest Federal Court Judge Max O. Cogburn Jr. for the crime of Perjury.

Judge Max O. Cogburn Jr. did Willfully, and with Malice, violate his Oath of Office in open Court on Friday October 10, 2014.

The legal definition of Perjury is — “the violation of an oath” — AND, since you yourself sir have taken an Oath to uphold the Laws of the State of NC, I’ll point you to NCGS 14-209.

[It's Optional to read them the Actual Statute]

” § 14-209. Punishment for perjury.
If any person shall willfully and corruptly commit perjury, on his oath or affirmation, in any suit, controversy, matter or cause, depending in any of the courts of the State, or in any deposition or affidavit taken pursuant to law, or in any oath or affirmation duly administered of or concerning any matter or thing whereof such person is lawfully required to be sworn or affirmed, every person so offending shall be punished as a Class F felon.”

The crime of perjury was committed when Judge Max O. Cogburn Jr. ruled on the issue of NC’s Marriage Amendment. No where in the US Constitution does it state that the Federal Judiciary has any enumerated powers to regulate, or oversee, marriage.

However, the 10th Amendment to our US Constitution CLEARLY states that all powers NOT DELEGATED to the Federal Government by the constitution shall be left up to ‘We the People’.

[Optional to read them the 10th Amendment]

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

We the People of NC decided on May 12, 2012 that marriage is between ‘ONE MAN & ONE WOMAN ONLY’!

Then ask them —- What do you hear at VERY END of every Wedding over the last 150 years or so? Please tell me?

Let me refresh your memory —- “By the power vested in me by the State of NC [or some other state], I do hereby pronounce you Husband & Wife [or Man & Wife]. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.”   

 

Also contact Attorney General Roy Cooper’s office with the same message. 

Roy Cooper (919) 716 – 6400

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Thirteenth Day of October in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fourteen.


Judge Cogburn seen here with Kay Hagan.

Judge Cogburn seen here with Kay Hagan.

 

 

Resolution to remove  U.S. District Court Judge Max O. Cogburn Jr. for Perjury  

   

  

Whereas, on May 8, 2012, the citizens of North Carolina voted overwhelmingly to approve an amendment – the Marriage Amendment – to the state constitution, which reads as follows:

 

 

Sec.6. Marriage. Marriage between one man and one woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this State. This section does not prohibit a private party from entering into contracts with another private party; nor does this section prohibit courts from adjudicating the rights of private parties pursuant to such contracts. (2011-409, s. 1) 

     

 

Whereas, the NC state constitution provides two ways in which it can be amended: (1) by a convention of the people; or (2) by legislative initiative; and

Whereas, historically, North Carolina’s constitutional amendments have come by legislative initiative (i.e., a proposal from the General Assembly); and

Whereas, the State Constitution sets forth the procedure by which the General Assembly may initiate and the people may ratify or reject an amendment, including prescribing the time and manner the proposed amendment is to be submitted to the voters:

Whereas, marriage (its definition and its regulation) is a traditional STATE issue, under its inherent state sovereign police powers (to regulate for the health, safety, welfare, and morality of its people; the federal government has NO such police powers); and

Whereas, the Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution, by its plain and simple language, ensures that the federal government shall not infringe upon state powers and hence never encroach upon state issues:

 

 

 

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”  

    

 

Whereas, the Preamble to the Bill of Rights (which many states insisted upon before agreeing to be bound by the Constitution) articulates the unequivocal reason for the amendments:

 

 

 

The Preamble to The Bill of Rights:

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; ….
    

 

 

Whereas, the People of North Carolina and their state legislature have rightfully and legally amended the state constitution; and

Whereas, on July 28, 2014, the federal 4th District Court of Appeals ruled 2-to-1 that Virgina’s “Marriage Amendment” (adopted by the voters in Virginia by ballot in 2006) is unconstitutional – the first federal court ruling on this issue to affect the South; and

Whereas, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals includes North Carolina (it hears appeals from the nine federal district courts in Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina); and

Whereas, Federal District Court Judge Max O. Cogburn Jr., from the Western District of North Carolina, on October 10, 2014 ruled on an issue here in North Carolina that the Federal Judiciary has no power to rule on; and

Whereas, Judge Cogburn did willfully and with malice violate his Federal Oath of Office and committed perjury in open court; and

Whereas, Judge Max O. Cogburn took an Oath of Office which states:

 

 

“I, ____________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as ____________ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”  

   

 

Whereas, Judge Cogburrn lives and resides in the State of North Carolina and is bound by the laws thereof; and

Whereas, North Carolina General Statute 14-209 states the following:

 

 

§ 14-209. Punishment for perjury.
If any person shall willfully and corruptly commit perjury, on his oath or affirmation, in any suit, controversy, matter or cause, depending in any of the courts of the State, or in any deposition or affidavit taken pursuant to law, or in any oath or affirmation duly administered of or concerning any matter or thing whereof such person is lawfully required to be sworn or affirmed, every person so offending shall be punished as a Class F felon.(1791, c. 338, s. 1, P.R.; R.C., c. 34, s. 49; Code, s. 1092; Rev., s. 3615; C.S., s. 4364; 1979, c. 760, s. 5; 1979, 2nd Sess., c. 1316, s. 47; 1981, c. 63, s.1, c. 179, s. 14; 1993, c. 539, s. 1202; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c).)  

 

Therefore, be it Resolved that we (insert your group name) do hereby demand the immediate removal of Federal District Court Judge Max O. Cogburn from office and charge him with the crime of Perjury; and

 

 

Therefore, be it also resolved that we do hereby demand impeachment proceedings be started immediately against Federal District Court Judge Max O. Cogburn Jr..

 

 

 

 

 

  Perjury   

 

 

 

 

Associated Links:

http://www.ncwd.uscourts.gov/content/judge-max-o-cogburn-jr

http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/PDF/ByArticle/Chapter_14/Article_28.pdf

http://www.uscourts.gov/Viewer.aspx?doc=/uscourts/RulesAndPolicies/conduct/jud_conduct_and_disability_procedure.pdf

http://www.uscourts.gov/news/newsView/10-07-08/Filing_a_Complaint_Against_a_Federal_Judge.aspx

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Eleventh Day of October in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fourteen.


 

 

 

On the evening of December 27, 2012, our current US Senator Kay Hagan voted against protecting your 4th Amendment Rights.

    

    

Please do not reward her, by giving

her your vote in November of 2014.

 

 

Click to enlarge.

Click to enlarge.

 

 

 

Here is the TEXT of what she voted against.

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

 

 

She also doesn’t like the 2nd Amendment either.

 

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

 

 

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Eighth Day of October in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fourteen.


This morning on Fox & Friends, NC mother Pattie Curran was interviewed. Her 2 boys have a Rare Bone Marrow disease and she explains how her ‘Out Of Pocket’ prescription costs have sky-rocketed.

         

PattieCurran

 

Here’s a link to this mornings segment on Fox & Friends.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/3821746005001/how-obamacare-more-than-doubled-one-familys-yearly-costs/#sp=show-clips

 

 

 

She also has a piece published in the Washington Times 

       As the mother of two chronically ill children, I have long faced high health care costs. My sons suffer from a rare bone-marrow failure syndrome called Shwachman-Diamond syndrome and have secondary mitochondrial disease that requires treatment with a broad range of expensive medications. We averaged $10,000 to $12,000 a year in billed out-of-pocket medical expenses before Obamacare became law. In 2013, we incurred just over $27,000 in out-of-pocket medical expenses. President Obama’s signature piece of legislation has more than doubled our yearly medical costs.

      

And remember to FIRE KAY HAGAN this November!

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Fifth Day of October in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fourteen.


Fresh Froglegs are Served!

 

 

 

IFLMarkTwainLawn

http://intellectualfroglegs.com/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Fifth Day of October in the year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fourteen.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 51 other followers