Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Local Politicians’ Category


Tyranny — by Definition

tyrannytj

 

 

Definition of tyranny (Merriam Webster Dictionary)

    1 :  oppressive power <every form of tyranny over the mind of man — Thomas Jefferson>; especially :  oppressive power exerted by government <the tyranny of a police state>

 

Please help if you can. Share this info. A financial contribution will help too. $5 – $10 – whatever you can afford. It is amazing how a bunch of folks, with small contributions, can help restore the rule of law.

 

 

 

https://www.gofundme.com/judge-denies-veteran-his-rights

 

 

Does the U.S. Constitution define certain ‘RIGHTS’ held by all citizens of these United States?

              

Does our N.C. State Constitution confirm some these rights?

                      

                                   

The “REAL” answer to the above two questions is actually NO!

                 

                                   

At least that is how it is applied in the Durham County Court system here in North Carolina.

                          

                       

Former assistant district attorney, recently elected local district judge, completely discards her oath to uphold the Constitutions and places the boot of ‘TYRANNY’ on a local veteran.

 

What was his crime? He asked some questions! OMG, The HORROR!

       

 

Other links to the ‘Rest Of The Story’ – These are very detailed & long reads.

 

 

https://silencedogood2010.wordpress.com/2016/05/30/korea-era-veteran-is-under-attack/

 

https://silencedogood2010.wordpress.com/2016/11/16/korean-vet-under-attack-part-ii/

 

 

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Twentieth Day of February in the Year of Lord, Two Thousand and Seventeen. Our former Presidents are rolling over in their graves at what has been done to our beloved Constitution.

 

 

 

 

 

Read Full Post »


 

Representative Paul Luebke passed away on Saturday, October 29, 2016. My sincere condolences & prayers go out to his family.

Now, this leaves a vacancy in Durham’s Representation in the North Carolina General Assembly. According to our General Statutes, the Durham County Democratic Party can make a recommendation to the Governor to appoint a replacement for the remaining term that Luebke was elected to. That terms ends on January 1, 2017. See NCGS § 163-11.

Now, we are encountering an UNUSUAL situation here; We are 8 days away from the General Election. The ballots have been printed and we’ve already started ‘Early Voting’, so I’m sure there are many that have already cast a ballot for Mr. Luebke. After all, he was the heavy favorite in ‘The Democrat controlled Utopia of Durham’.

Here’s the dilemma:  As of his DEATH on Saturday, Mr. Luebke is no longer eligible to run for the NC House.

NC State Constitution, Article II – Section 7

Sec. 7.  Qualifications for Representative.

 

Each Representative, at the time of his election, shall be a qualified voter of the State, and shall have resided in the district for which he is chosen for one year immediately preceding his election.

 

 

Since Mr. Luebke is disqualified from THIS Particular Election, the other candidate on the ballot, Elissa Fuchs, will be the ONLY QUALIFIED Candidate to receive votes. She SHOULD BE declared the winner of this particular race. However, from my early chats with our officials, it appears the democrats will pick his replacement. And our GOP will stand by & allow it.

 

I personally have scoured through the majority of Chapter 163 of our elections statutes and I can NOT find anything to address this particular situation. Now, there are statutes on ‘Deaths Before & After a Primary Election’, and as stated above, filling a vacancy  while in office, but nothing on how to handle a candidates death, this close to a General Election. If I’ve missed the statute in Chapter 163, you legal scholars please correct me & point me to it.

Now, for a full disclaimer, I’m NOT a fan of Mr. Luebke. He was a socialist. I’ve questioned for years whether or not he even resided within the district that he represents. His other job is a ‘Professor of Sociology’ at UNC-G in Greensboro NC. That’s a heck of a commute on a daily basis … 60 plus miles one way. And he UNLAWFULLY uses his NC Legislative Email account for correspondence with his students & other faculty there at UNC-G. Listed on his UNC-G Profile.

paulluebkeuncgpage

Screengrab from the UNC-G faculty page. Notice the ncleg.net email address

On his NC Legislative page, he lists his address as a P.O. Box. Upon further investigation, this SAME P.O. Box is assigned to a company named Denson Printing here in Durham. Did Luebke RESIDE at Denson Printing or maybe just got his mail there?   Who knows?

 

paulluebkepaulluebkedensonprintingsameaddress

If we look up Mr. Luebke on the State Voter database, he lists an address of 311 S. LaSalle St. This is the address of Duke Manor Apartments. Over the last 20 plus years, Duke Manor has been a haven for thugs & illegals. I just can’t imagine a NC Representative actually living in a place like this. I’ve got a sneaky suspicion that this was a ‘Phantom Address’ to allow him to file for election.

paulluebkeresidencedukemanor

Board of Elections Filing Data

                                

A simple Google Search will turn up THOUSANDS of hits for ‘Duke Manor Crime’ over the last several years.

 paulluebkedukemanor01paulluebkedukemanor02

I hope and pray that our GOP leaders won’t cave in, as usual, & allow the Democrats keep control of this seat in the NC General Assembly. The legal team needs to RE-READ the actual LAWS and not just ‘Go With The FLOW’ like they have done in the past.

                                     

And, if the legal team wants to investigate our Durham State Senator, Mike Woodard, I did a write-up on him years past. He TOO uses a non-residential address.

https://silencedogood2010.wordpress.com/2014/10/15/nc-state-senator-has-a-strange-personal-address/

                                  

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Thirty First Day of October in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen.

Read Full Post »


 

 

North Carolina’s Voter ID Law has some MORE support that I, SilenceDogood2010, have stumbled across.

 

 

 

Most recently, it was brought to my attention that in August of 2016, those nutty & wacky court justices of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals printed the following in one of their opinions;

 

 

9thcircuitopinion_nojurisdiction_2016

9th Circuit opinion, August 2016

 

 

 

 

Now, upon further research, I find that the US Supreme Court issued basically the same statement in 2013.

 

 

 

 

gunnvsminton02

February 2013, supreme Court opinion.

 

 

 

 

 

That statement IS:

 

 

“Federal courts are courts of limited subject-matter jurisdiction, possessing only that power authorized by the Constitution and by Congress.”  

 

 

 

OK legal scholars, please tell me again how the lower district courts, and the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, has jurisdiction over a case involving the State of North Carolina & its Voter ID Legislation? What about over ‘Election Districts’ & how they were drawn? And lastly, let us revisit N.C.’s Amendment 1, Same Sex Marriage — A Constitutional Amendment passed by the voters of the State of N.C. . . . How does a Federal District Court have any say in how a State modifies its ‘Constitution’? Or the authority to overrule it?

 

28usc1344electiondisputes

 

 

 

Misc. Links.

          

Gunn Vs Minton – A SCOTUS Opinion

 

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-1118_b97c.pdf

 

 

Election Disputes – 28 USC 1344 – This states what the federal district courts have control over . . . aka jurisdiction concerning election issues.

 

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2010-title28/html/USCODE-2010-title28-partIV-chap85-sec1344.htm

 

https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/08/16/15-10117.pdf

 

https://silencedogood2010.wordpress.com/2016/09/01/nc-can-enforce-its-voter-id-law/

 

Full list of district courts jurisdiction — the Federal Code 28 USC, Chapter 85.

http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title28/part4/chapter85&edition=prelim

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Sixteenth day of September in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Sixteen.

Read Full Post »


 

yeoldschoolhouse1

 

 

My previous post was focused on Virginia’s Schools and then this morning, I stumbled across THIS GEM  from our own back yards — NC Department of Public Instruction headed up by none other than June Atkinson of the Democratic Party! She is SOoooo proud of these numbers! They are showing ‘Improvements’ over the last few years. You however, should be APPALLED!

 

JuneAtkinson

Here’s the Full Report — 164 pages in a nice PDF file. I spent about 1.5 hours this morning going over it. Read it they said. It’ll be FUN they said! Nope!

Below is just a FEW of the graphs & charts I pulled out of the report. I’ll let YOU decide what sort of trends you notice.

 

Are you happy with these numbers? Click to enlarge the image.

Are you happy with these numbers? Click to enlarge the image.

 

 

Let’s START with the 32 schools, then move to the 26, then the 40, etc. etc. It’s TIME to use some RID-X and pump these Septic Tanks Clean before they spread MORE Disease & Mayhem.

Click to enlarge the image.

Click to enlarge the image.

 

Click to enlarge any of the images.

NCSchoolCrime2015Reportpg37RacialSuspensions NCSchoolCrime2015Reportpg44RacialSuspensionsLongTerm NCSchoolCrime2015Reportpg70DurhamSuspensionsLongVsShortTerm

I’ll  urge you contact your local Board of Education. Here’s the Contact Info for Durham’s Board.

Click to enlarge the image.

Click to enlarge the image.

 

Daily Haymaker also has a good write-up on this issue.

 

 

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Eighteenth Day of March in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fifteen.

It is also SD2010’s 5th birthday. This site was born on March 18th, 2010 Anno Domini.

Read Full Post »


 

 

 

GOP_LOGO

 

                      

Resolution to close Republican primaries in North Carolina.

 

 

Whereas, the current North Carolina practice of holding open primaries, could allow non-Republicans to pick the North Carolina GOP candidates for the general election.

Whereas, the North Carolina GOP can close the primaries as per ;§ 163 119. Voting by unaffiliated voter in party primary. If a political party has, by action of its State Executive Committee reported to the State Board of Elections by resolution delivered no later than the first day of December preceding a primary, provided that unaffiliated voters may vote in the primary of that party, an unaffiliated voter may vote in the primary of that party by announcing that intention under G.S. 163 166.7(a). For a party to withdraw its permission, it must do so by action of its State Executive Committee, similarly reported to the State Board of Elections no later than the first day of December preceding the primary where the withdrawal is to become effective. (1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 762, s. 7; 2002 159, s. 21(a).)

Whereas, Republicans are most likely to pick the candidates that most closely adhere to and advance the platform of the NC GOP.

Whereas, the significant number of Republicans who have recently left the GOP may well be encouraged to re-register as Republicans if that were the only way they could influence the party slate.

Whereas, open primaries make it possible for non-Republicans to skew the primary vote so that the candidate that most reflects the values of the Republican Party does not receive enough votes to avoid an expensive run-off election.

Whereas, hijinks such as Sen. Thad Cochran’s controversial tactic of recruiting Democrats to secure his nomination in Mississippi’s most recent Republican primary result in a lack of trust in the electoral process by the voting public.

Whereas, trust in the party is essential if our GOP candidates are to win elections.

Therefore be it resolved that the NC State GOP close its primaries and allow only registered Republicans to vote in them and that this resolution shall become effective upon adoption.

 

 

Written by Fremont V Brown III

          

         

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Tenth Day of March in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fifteen.

Read Full Post »


 

W4ExemptWithholdNoTax

 

For years and years, we have been enslaved by the IRS. People are FRIGHTENED by the simple mention of those 3  little letters.

The time has come to shake off the SHACKLES of slavery. Take the WHIP of Tyranny away from the Overseer.  Hit him where it hurts…. IN THE POCKETBOOK!

The Proposal:

If you are fortunate enough to still have a job in this economy, change your W-4 withholding to EXEMPT.

The Income Tax (created by the 16th Amendment) is a Complete Fraud and a lie. You can read more on this HERE and HERE.  The 16th was NEVER Legally Ratified by the states so it is NULL & VOID —- Forget what the “Tax People” tell you, they have been indoctrinated to believe a lie.

Mark Twain said it best…

 

mark-twain-it-s-easier-to-fool-people-than-to-convince-them-they-have-been-fooled1

 

If you don’t feel comfortable about claiming EXEMPT, then at least change your with-holdings to a very HIGH Number… So that each paycheck has less taxes taken out.

 

 

       

1913Taxes      

       

               

GovtGrasshopper      

   

To quote a Current North Carolina Statesman, Once the government becomes lawless, it is not just the right, but the responsibility, the Duty, of a free People to react in an equal or more so lawless manner!” ~ G.R. Smith

   

Stop Feeding the Beast!

 

Watch the video below — yes, it’s 13 minutes long — go grab a beverage 1st if you must.   

 

 

 

 

Other Links:

http://netrightdaily.com/2014/12/protecting-irs-lawbreakers/

 

 

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Eighth Day of December in the Years of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fourteen.

Read Full Post »


ProjectVeritasLogoBlue   

    

Update: Oct. 31, 2014 – Greg Amick, Carmichael’s campaign manager, stepped down Friday. 

     

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/10/31/5281258/campaign-worker-steps-down-after.html#.VFQn7GeEzYQ

      

    

~~~ End of Updates ~~~

  

Project Veritas Strikes Again.   

   

 

This time documenting Democrats AND Republicans committing Felonies.

http://www.projectveritasaction.com/video/ncillegalvoting?utm_source=PVaction&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id%3A28958278&utm_campaign=NC+Release

 

 

 

 

Why is a Doretta Walker campaign worker allowed into the Durham County Board of Elections? AND while Voting is taking place?

Why is a Doretta Walker campaign worker allowed into the Durham County Board of Elections while Voting is taking place?

     

    

    

Mecklenburg County seems to have a LOT of Problems. They have BOTH candidates for Sheriff that support Illegals casting a ballot. Carmichael & Hailey! And a District Court Judcial Candidate, Yolanda Trotman.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Irwin Carmichael Mecklenburg County Sheriff Candidate (Democrat)

http://www.irwinforsheriff.com/
   

Yolanda Trotman running for District Court Judge Mecklenburg County.

http://yolandatrotmanforjudge.com/
    

Republican Chris Hailey running for Mecklenburg County Sheriff.

http://www.votehailey.com/

 

Let us review the NC General Statutes:

 

§ 163-275. Certain acts declared felonies.

Any person who shall, in connection with any primary, general or special election held in this State, do any of the acts or things declared in this section to be unlawful, shall be guilty of a Class I felony. It shall be unlawful:

(18) For any person, knowing that a person is not a citizen of the United States, to instruct or coerce that person to register to vote or to vote.   

 

http://www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/BySection/Chapter_163/GS_163-275.html

 

 

Text of the Project Veritas exchange with the campaign / poll workers. [Just in case the PV site gets removed —- you know what I mean? ]

PVA: Do you want to tell him your situation?

PVA: Yeah, I do have my license

Greg Amick: Un huh.

PVA: But I am not legal and I want to vote.

Greg Amick: Okay.

PVA: But I do have my license, I’m registered.

Greg Amick: You are registered?

PVA: I’m all registered.

Greg Amick: You do not need a photo ID. When did you register?

PVA: I don’t have my green card.

Greg Amick: You are registered to vote though?

PVA: I’m all registered to vote, and I want to vote.

PVA 2: What happened is, the state gave a bunch of “illegals”, when they gave them their license with the DACA card for the Dream Act. A lot of them inadvertently got their voter registration card as well.

Greg: Okay.

VO #2: Earlier this month, voter rolls in North Carolina were shown to include a large number of immigrants who had been registered to vote but who shouldn’t have.

PVA 2: So technically they are not legal but she really wants to be able to support Kay Hagen.

Greg Amick: Here’s a couple of things you can do. You do not have to have your driver’s license, but do you have any sort of identification?

PVA: But I do have my driver’s license.

Greg Amick: Oh, you do. Show ‘em that and you’re good.

PVA: But the only problem, you know, I don’t want to vote if I’m not legal.
I think that’s going to be a problem. I’m not sure.

Greg Amick: It won’t be, it shouldn’t be an issue at all.

PVA: No?

Greg Amick: As long as you are registered to vote, you’ll be fine.

VO #3: The North Carolina law is very clear,

“Any person who shall, in connection with any primary, general or special election held in this state, do any of the acts or things declared in this section to be unlawful, shall be guilty of a Class 1 felony. It shall be unlawful:

For any person, knowing that a person is not a citizen of the United States, to instruct or coerce that person to register to vote or to vote.”

PVA: Is it legal for her to vote, if she’s not a citizen?

Greg Amick: If you’re registered vote… You got a voter registration card?

PVA: Yes.

Greg Amick: Then you’re good to vote.

VO #4: It seemed everyone we asked thought it was okay for this non U.S. citizen to vote.

PVA: I have my license, I’m registered to vote, but I’m undocumented, I’m an illegal. But I want to vote. I want to support Kay Hagen, that’s who I am here for.

Campaign Worker: You are already registered?

PVA: Yes.

Woman in brown: I’m going to tell you what, I’d go in there and vote and whatever address you used before, use it. I’d go in there and vote and let them find out if it’s wrong.

VO #5: This campaign worker is supporting republican Chris Hailey who is running against Irwin Carmichael for Sheriff.

Woman with glasses-Hailey for Sheriff

PVA: We want to make sure Kay Hagen is pro-immigrant, you know we don’t know if she…

Woman: She definitely is.

PVA: I don’t want to give my vote if she’s not.

Woman: Yes, she definitely is.

PVA: She’s okay with like illegals.

Woman: Absolutely.

PVA: You think she’s okay with me being an illegal voter for her?

Woman: Absolutely.

PVA: So Kay Hagan wouldn’t mind her voting even if she’s not a citizen?

Woman: No.

PVA: Okay.

Woman: Welcome aboard.

PVA: Thank you.

VO #5: She even decided to call her boss to double check.

Woman: Okay , great. Thank you. You should be fine as long as you’re registered.

PVA: Who told you that? That was your boss?

Woman: Yeah, I just spoke with the campaign manager.

PVA: Oh cool.

VO #6: Darren Simms is the Campaign Manager for Yolanda Trotman who, believe it or not, is running for District Court Judge in the county.

PVA: We just to vote for Kay Hagen because my girlfriend is a…she is not a citizen yet.

Darren Simms: Okay.

PVA: I have my license.

PVA: She does have license. She’s registered to vote but she not, even though she’s technically not a citizen.

Darren Simms: Okay.

PVA: But she actually has the…

Darren Simms: …the registration card. So all you have to do is going in there and them your name and address.

PVA: So that’s what I’m afraid because I am illegal. I don’t want to give my information and then they get back to me.

PVA: Does she have to do that?

Darren Simms: So they are either going to ask you for your ID.

PVA: I have it.

Darren Simms: Okay yeah, as long as she has an ID and she shows the ID.

PVA: And she’s registered to vote.

Darren Simms: She’s registered to vote.

PVA: But she’s not a …she’s undocumented. Does that matter or not?

Darren Simms: Okay. Do you have her registration card?

PVA: She does. She has all that.

Darren Simms: Does the registration card have an address on it?

PVA: Yes.

Darren Simms: Okay. As long you show ‘em that and it has an address on it, you’re good.

PVA: Oh good.

Darren Simms: Okay.

PVA: They’re not going to call immigration?

Darren Simms: No, no, no, no, no, no.

PVA: Good. Good.

Darren Simms: As long as you got voter card… Just pull out the voter’s card and give it to ‘em.

VO #7: Martin Kelly is the father of David Kelly who, believe it or not, is running for Superior Court Judge. Currently, David is an Assistant District Attorney for the county.

Martin Kelly: How did you register without being a citizen?

PVA Investigator: Because she got a DACA card.

Woman: And that’s a temporary, that’s temporary one?

PVA Investigator: No.

Martin Kelly: If they her register then she can’t get in trouble.

Martin Kelly: If you registered…(shrugs shoulders)

Martin Kelly: All they can do is say no. They can’t do anything else.  

   

   

Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Thirtieth Day of October in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fourteen.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »