Refugees and the LAW
With all the news of the ‘Widows & Orphans’ being denied access to come here, I thought I would delve into what the actual law states. For your convenience, I have taken a few screen grabs from the law itself. This might help you with your ‘Low Info Friends’ too — since they can’t seem to comprehend what they read.
Please review the embedded links thoroughly — Don’t just take ‘MY WORD’ for it.
1st – Allow me to DEFINE what a refugee IS — According to the Actual LAW;
(42) The term “refugee” means:
(A) any person who is outside any country of such person’s nationality or, in the case of a person having no nationality, is outside any country in which such person last habitually resided, and who is unable or unwilling to return to, and is unable or unwilling to avail himself or herself of the protection of, that country because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion, or
(B) in such circumstances as the President after appropriate consultation (as defined in section 207(e) of this Act) may specify, any person who is within the country of such person’s nationality or, in the case of a person having no nationality, within the country in which such person is habitually residing, and who is persecuted or who has a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. The term “refugee” does not include any person who ordered, incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in the persecution of any person on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. For purposes of determinations under this Act, a person who has been forced to abort a pregnancy or to undergo involuntary sterilization, or who has been persecuted for failure or refusal to undergo such a procedure or for other resistance to a coercive population control program, shall be deemed to have been persecuted on account of political opinion, and a person who has a well founded fear that he or she will be forced to undergo such a procedure or subject to persecution for such failure, refusal, or resistance shall be deemed to have a well founded fear of persecution on account of political opinion.
So we’ve defined the term ‘REFUGEE’ — Now we will look at what the law says about INELIGIBLE Individuals.
(3) Security and related grounds.-
(A) In general.-Any alien who a consular officer or the Attorney General knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, seeks to enter the United States to engage solely, principally, or incidentally in-
(i) any activity (I) to violate any law of the United States relating to espionage or sabotage or (II) to violate or evade any law prohibiting the export from the United States of goods, technology, or sensitive information,
(ii) any other unlawful activity, or
(iii) any activity a purpose of which is the opposition to, or the control or overthrow of, the Government of the United States by force, violence, or other unlawful means, is inadmissible.
The ‘Center for Security Policy’ states, in this press release from June 2015 — A majority of muslims living the U.S.A. think Sharia Law should be enforced throughout the country.
According to a new nationwide online survey (Below) of 600 Muslims living in the United States, significant minorities embrace supremacist notions that could pose a threat to America’s security and its constitutional form of government.
The numbers of potential jihadists among the majority of Muslims who appear not to be sympathetic to such notions raise a number of public policy choices that warrant careful consideration and urgent debate, including: the necessity for enhanced surveillance of Muslim communities; refugee resettlement, asylum and other immigration programs that are swelling their numbers and density; and the viability of so-called “countering violent extremism” initiatives that are supposed to stymie radicalization within those communities.
More than half (51%) of U.S. Muslims polled also believe either that they should have the choice of American or shariah courts, or that they should have their own tribunals to apply shariah. “
The law says that anyone who is in ‘Opposition’ to the Constitution (the LAW of the Government of the United States) – Is INELIGIBLE to be admitted to the United States.
I think it is safe to say, and the law is on our side on this one — That we must deport and remove ALL Muslims from the United States of America. It is against the LAW for them to be here to begin with. And that law has been on the books since at least 1952 — It states this in the INA Act of 1952.
And lest we forget ‘Taqiyya & Kitman’ that is practiced by all muslims.
Nor should we forget the LAW that prohibits ‘Aiding & Abetting’ and ‘Encouraging’ those who are here Illegally. It prohibits ANYONE, including the President, an Adviser, a Cabinet Member, a Mayor and even a DOG Catcher from engaging in these actions.
Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324
Respectfully submitted by SilenceDogood2010 this Twenty First Day of November in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Fifteen.
Read Full Post »